Visitor Op-Ed: The Threat to Democracy Is NOT Donald Trump

Guest editorial by Jim Nelles:

Imagine, if you will, a nation in which regional, state, and federal district attorneys collaborate with the ministry of justice, foreign-born billionaires, and the country’s leader to keep the leader of the opposition celebration off the election tally, and after that insolvent and lock up that opposition leader.

That nation would deal with sanctions from the civilized world. Business media would decry the function of criminals who wish to take the voice of the individuals away by rejecting them the capability to choose their prospect of option.

Perhaps individuals would even require to the streets to object such actions and the death of democracy.

That could just take place in a third-world banana republic? Aren’t those the methods of Putin in Russia, Maduro in Venezuela, and Castro in Cuba?

Sadly, this is not the scenario under some socialist totalitarian. It is the existing political scenario in the United States under the Biden Administration.

The Republican front-runner and presumptive GOP candidate for president in the 2024 election is being assaulted on numerous fronts through something that has actually ended up being called lawfare.

Fortunately, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 9-0 on Tuesday, just mentioning that duty for imposing Section 3 versus federal officeholders and prospects rests with Congress and the states the “judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court for that reason can not stand.”

This ought to at last remove any argument to keep the previous president off the 2024 tally.

Even though previous President Trump can appear on the tally, it is necessary to comprehend the history of the effort to eliminate him from the tally, and who lagged this effort.

Officials in Colorado, Maine, and Illinois ruled that Mr. Trump is disqualified to be on the 2024 governmental tally due to the fact that he breached the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

More particularly, these authorities asserted that since of his actions on January 6, 2021, Trump breached Section Three of the modification, which specifies that no individual who has actually taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States can hold workplace if they take part in an insurrection or disobedience versus the United States.

Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment was composed after the Civil War to keep previous Confederate authorities from acquiring power in the federal government.

To date, just one authorities has actually been gotten rid of from workplace for his actions on January 6. And the judgment of the Supreme Court might bring that choice into concern.

A New Mexico County commissioner, Couy Griffin, was eliminated from workplace for breaking Section 3 of the 14 th Amendment by State District Court Judge Francis Mathew, the very first time because 1869 that a judge has actually gotten rid of a public authorities under Section 3.

However, there was a significant distinction in between the case versus Mr. Griffin and Mr. Trump. Mr. Griffin was charged, attempted, and founded guilty in a federal court of a misdemeanor for getting in the Capital premises on January 6. He was sentenced to 14 days in prison and provided credit for time served.

President Trump has actually not been charged, attempted, or founded guilty of any criminal offense connecting to January 6.

Special Counsel, Jack Smith, has actually brought 4 charges versus Mr. Trump for his actions after the 2020 election. Mr. Smith charged Mr. Trump with 3 conspiracies and one count of blocking or trying to block a main case. Mr. Smith did not charge Mr. Trump with leading, prompting, or taking part in an insurrection or disobedience versus the United States, in spite of having carte blanch to do so.

Who lagged the efforts to get rid of the previous president from the 2024 governmental tally?

Unsurprisingly, liberal groups backed by none besides George Soros.

Per Bloomberg, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, called CREW, and a group called Free Speech for People, have actually been working for years to eliminate Trump from the 2024 tally.

These groups have actually raised countless dollars from left wing donors, consisting of George Soros and Craig Newmark, the creator of Craig’s list.

Their efforts stopped working thanks to a consentaneous choice by the Supreme Court. The consentaneous choice should, ideally, closed down the leftist talking points that the choice was driven by the “extreme right” of the court.

Trump’s difficulties are not over. Not by a long shot.

The previous President is dealing with 4 criminal indictments and one civil scams case, brought by liberal, and when it comes to Alvin Bragg and Letitia James, George Soros backed, district attorneys. If founded guilty on all charges, Mr. Trump deals with more than 600 years in jail, a virtual death sentence.

Their objective: bankrupt the previous president, reject him the capability to project, and ultimately, have him pass away in jail.

A sitting president utilizing his Department of Justice and the legal system to attempt and insolvent and prison a political challenger and disenfranchise half of the nation’s citizens has all the trademarks of a tinpot dictatorship.

Jim Nelles is a supply chain expert based and political expert in Chicago, IL. He has actually functioned as a Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Supply Chain Officer, and a Chief Operations Officer for several business. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Northwestern University in Economics and French along with a Masters in Management from the JL Kellogg Graduate School of Business.

The post Guest Op-Ed: The Threat to Democracy Is NOT Donald Trump appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit

This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.