We discovered Friday that El Paso County, Colorado had an extremely uncommon Logic and Accuracy test for the 2022 Secretary of State Primary recount.
This is the very same main in which retired United States Air Force officerLynda Zamora Wilson was informed she lost a race she had actually simply been stated the winner of by a substantial margin, just to have it removed away 38 minutes later on without any description. Wilson won her convention seat versus her challenger 52% to 48% in April with simply a 2 week old project.
obviously, this is extremely uncommon and irregular. How can makers be tossing out over 50% of the tallies?
After a number of interviews today with individuals that were at the test (one remained in the sound evidence space that cost thousands to be within), we now understand that:
1.) they altered the criteria of the makers to evaluate the tallies
Why are they altering criteria to these devices prior to a recount? Who licensed these modifications and who performed them? Were they re-certified to EAC requirements after the modifications were made?
2.) the test tallies were computer system created by “the computer systems”
First, Colorado law needs the tallies be “citizen validated tallies” (more on that listed below). If the test tallies were produced by computer systems, why wasn’t it divulged and prepared for when they started? Is merely informing individuals that these should produce 2266 adjudications is excessive for something they’re paying 10s of countless dollars for? This would really be another method to make sure the makers are working correctly: inform the prospects the number of under votes and over votes there must be included in the test deck! And it would avoid individuals from asking concerns like these.
Instead, we are entrusted to a 54% adjudication rate, an apparently unapproved and uncertified upgrade to the election device, and more “trust us”. Individuals inside the space throughout the count stated that it was not anticipated and authorities were rushing to discover election judges and watchers.
3.) the Secretary of State determines that they search for a more comprehensive variety of mistakes when carrying out the Logic and Accuracy test compared to the election itself
Why are more mistakes tried to find in a recount?
Why are blank votes “adjudicated”? They must simply be blank! If we picked to avoid over a race, there’s a possibility somebody will get the chance to identify my intent for that vote I intentionally left blank?
Why do the makers require to be changed in order guarantee they worked correctly the very first time?
El Paso initially needs a test of a minimum of 25 tallies. Is the El Paso elections department so over-zealous that they exceeded the county required by a 4,241 tallies?
There should not be any changes required for these makers. They need to be ran as they were on June 28 th, 2022 to imitate the election.
4.)– each of the 2266 tallies require to be adjudicated with each count There are 7 counts. They might have ended up 4 today, which implies tomorrow they have 3 more. At this moment, why would not they have simply done a hand count? I’m grateful you asked:
Thanks to Ashe in America, we understand that CRS 1-105-102 Sec 3 Paragraph “a” specifies that:
” Prior to any recount, the canvass board will pick at random and test ballot gadgets utilized in the prospect race, tally problem, or tally concern that is the topic of the recount. The board will utilize the ballot gadgets it has actually picked to carry out a contrast of the maker count of the tallies depended on each such ballot gadget for the prospect race, tally problem, or tally concern to the matching handbook count of the VOTER VERIFIED paper records” (Emphasis included)
This suggests that the county must be mandated to count these tallies by hand, and, more notably, they need to be citizen confirmed, not “computer system printer confirmed”.
The test deck being utilized for this test is supposedly the exact same deck that was utilized in the 2022 primaries a number of weeks back. El Paso Co Clerk prospect Peter Lupia discussed that formerly, and it was validated from a couple of clerks as being talked about in a call with the SOS today. This “test deck” initially had 6 to 7 adjudications per batch when it was run back in May of2022 The truth that the initial Logic & & Accuracy test had adjudications in and of itself is troubling. What’s a lot more troubling is that the “broadened” specifications in some way have actually discovered 2266 mistakes on tallies that formerly just had 6 or 7 per batch. And what’s most troubling is that this appeared to take everybody at the El Paso Elections Department today by total surprise as they scampered to discover the workers to achieve their job.
I am likewise being informed that a minimum of another county in Colorado has incredible adjudication rates. More to come.
CannConTips@protonmail.com
‘
The post UPDATE: El Paso County Logic and Accuracy Testing of Secretary of State Primary Race Raises Several Questions appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
