Trump Attorney John Eastman on California Lawfare Case: “They Doctored the Quotation in Court– Then the Judge Repeated the Doctored Quotation” (VIDEO)

President Trump’s legal representative John Eastman signed up with Emerald Robinson on The Absolute Truth on Thursday.

Eastman, a commonly highly regarded Constitutional lawyer, was formally disbarred previously today after a California leftist judge ruled he ought to have his law license removed for challenging the 2020 election.

Eastman on Thursday asked the judge to stop briefly the disbarment judgment, mentioning huge legal costs.

Trump 2020 election legal representative John Eastman dealt with disbarment in California for ‘weakening democracy’ by attempting to ‘reverse the governmental election.’

The January 6 Committee sent out the feds after John Eastman since he attempted to act versus the Democrats and their enormous election scams operation in 2020.

Eastman signed up with Emerald Robinson to discuss this lawfare case versus him. Throughout their discussion, Eastman exposed how the extreme lawyers pursuing him doctored a quote and after that the judge duplicated the doctored quote in their judgment.

Attorney John Eastman: Let me simply offer an upgrade. The California Bar Court hearing judge has actually suggested that I be disbarred. That action can just be taken if it’s validated by the California Supreme Court, and there’s a great deal of water to go under the bridge yet before we arrive. The instant result of the suggestion for disbarment is that I’m put on what’s called Involuntary Inactive Enrollment Status, which indicates that my California license is in the interim suspended while I pursue the appeal of this choice …

… I’ve stated it typically, if the law is consistently followed, this case had actually never ever been brought in the very first location. We have an argument on the truths of the 2020 election, and we have a difference on constitutional analysis on problems that have actually never ever been settled. That has actually never ever been the basis for disciplinary action. Look, I suggest, Thurgood Marshall really pursued lawsuits that was straight contrary to managing Supreme Court precedent, and he did it for several years. We got Brown versus Board of Education as an outcome of his persistence. This is what the legal representatives are anticipated to do if there’s a vibrant argument to be made, and there definitely was in my case. The concept that is subject not just to discipline, however real disbarment truly is focused on ruining our adversarial system of justice …

… Look, I indicate, in the closing argument quick that the bar attorneys submitted versus me back in December, they made a product misstatement. They declared that a court had actually ruled that the Electoral Count Act was constitutional. That was a main piece in my guidance. That was incorrect. They doctored the quote from the court. The viewpoint had absolutely nothing to do with the Electoral Count Act. And then the judge duplicated that doctored quote in her viewpoint versus me recently. That’s an outright misstatement to a court. The really things that they are wrongly implicating me of doing that must result in my disbarment, they really performed in the instruction in this case, and without any effects whatsoever. The double requirement is palpable, and we actually require to press back versus it.

GiveSendGo.com/ Eastman That’s our legal defense fund website. Individuals can go there.

Emerald Robinson: It’s not simply the California Disbarment case that you’re handling. It’s likewise what’s going on in Georgia. And after that there’s Politico reporting that Jack Smith, the federal district attorney in the Trump file case in the J6 associated indictments, is likewise smelling around your Disbarment case. Does that issue you, Dr. Eastman?

Attorney John Eastman: Well, all of these things issue me since we do not appear to have any idea of really pursuing the reality in these criminal matters. It’s got you on your political challengers. And anything that they believe will advance their program to get Trump and avoid him from being reelected is dad for the mill. This is what they’re doing. And if they believe by targeting me even more, that will assist them with their case versus Trump, then they will do it. I simply got a subpoena served on us recently by the Capitol Police Officers looking for whatever, all of my interactions with the President and any person else. They’ve entirely blown through attorney-client advantage. As we see in the Jeff Clark matter and the Peter Navarro matters, they’ve totally blown through enduring executive benefit, a main need for safeguarding separation of powers. These guys do not care about any of the standards, constitutional requirements or whatever. As long as they can get Trump, anything is level playing field in their view …

… There’s a suit by a number of members of the Capitol Police declaring that Trump is the one that triggered their injuries. And now they’ve me for all of my interactions for a year with customers, anything referencing the election, naturally, it has absolutely nothing to do with whatever injuries they suffered, and we’ll be objecting. It’s still these things are time consuming and expensive to deal with. That’s part of the video game. If they keep us bound investing our resources on defense versus these things, then those are resources and time and skill that can not be released in advancing elections for individuals that are reasonable that are going to get our nation back on track. That’s real.

Americans much better get up to the damage of our nation by these vicious leftists before it’s far too late.

Please assist John Eastman cover his lawfare expenses here

Via The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson.

EXCLUSIVE: Dr. John Eastman reacts to a CA judge’s suggestion to disbar him, plus responds to the on-going DC disbarment trial of @JeffClarkUS pic.twitter.com/32 tMKKC7xP

— The Absolute Truth with @EmeraldRobinson (@AbsoluteWithE) April 4, 2024

The post Trump Attorney John Eastman on California Lawfare Case: “They Doctored the Quotation in Court– Then the Judge Repeated the Doctored Quotation” (VIDEO) appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit

This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.