The Culling vs. Raffensperger Lawsuit: Evidence of Voting Machine Vulnerabilities and Fulton County 2020 Election Issues Entered into the Federal Record

On January 9th, the seven-years-long federal suit called Curling v. Raffensperger started in Atlanta, Ga. in Judge Amy Totenberg’s court. The case challenges the constitutionality of the Dominion Voting makers (initially the Diebold devices utilized given that 2002 and changed in 2019), arguing that the touchscreen Ballot Marking Devices (BMD) stop working to produce a voter-verifiable tally since the real citizen intent is consisted of in a QR code that can not read by the citizen.

Last year, VoterGA’s Ricardo Davis had the ability to place himself as a co-plaintiff and keep his own counsel, lawyer David Oles, to represent him in this case. This remained in addition to a group of attorneys currently arguing the case for the other complainants. Being in the court space, you can feel the stress in between the 2 sides of lawyers representing the complainants.

During the procedures so far, Oles has actually been fairly constrained in regards to arguing Davis’s case. The co-plaintiff’s group of legal representatives, led by David Cross, have actually reached challenging Oles throughout the incredibly restricted questioning he’s been managed from time to time. On Monday, throughout the questioning of UC Berkley Professor Philip Stark, Oles was given simply 2 concerns and some follow-up after a minutes-long sidebar in between the judge and practically a lots lawyers over whether he might ask any concerns. As Oles was asking Prof. Stark about the 17,852 missing out on tally images in Fulton County, Cross’s group of legal representatives interrupted and questioned the significance to the case. Judge Totenberg enabled the concern.

Yesterday, prior to the complainants rested their case to permit the accuseds to continue, Oles had the ability to proffer proof to the court from the skilled witness statements of Professors Philip Stark and J. Alex Halderman. As reported previosly by The Gateway Pundit, Dr. Halderman affirmed late recently and had the ability to hack into the Dominion ICX BMD in simply 5 seconds utilizing a ballpoint pen. This was a considerable advancement in the event as the general style so far has actually focused on the illegality and vulnerabilities of the touchscreen BMDs. The case has actually all however overlooked substantial vulnerabilities in the electronic election system as an entire and has actually revealed assistance for hand-marked paper tallies counted by optical scanners, as done in a lot of election jurisdictions throughout the nation.

David Oles was not allowed to ask any concerns throughout Dr. Halderman’s testament. He was just permitted 2 concerns of Dr. Philip Stark.

The proffers used by counsel from Dr. Stark’s statement were concentrated on abnormalities and problems in Georgia and, more particularly, in Fulton County:

1. A digital tally image is needed by the Dominion Voting System to produce tabulated elect the tally
2. Stark thinks digital tally images are election records that ought to be kept according to federal and state law
3. Georgia does not need digital tally images to be maintained for the duration defined by federal law
4. Georgia does not need digital tally images to be kept for the duration defined by state law
5. It is technically difficult to have more qualified votes than tally images if the elections procedures are followed properly
6. 17,852 accredited 2020 Fulton Co. votes have no initial tally image files
7. Additional VoterGA research study substantiates Dr. Starks findings that over 17,000 votes have missing out on tally images
8. Certified votes that have missing out on tally images is a sign of electronic vote tampering
9. 376,863 initial Dominion tally image declare the licensed Fulton Co. 2020 election are missing out on
10. The missing out on initial tally images files made it difficult to investigate the 2020 election

The Gateway Pundit has actually covered much of these problems consisting of this 4-part series about Georgia’s 2020 and subsequent elections.

Proffers from Dr. Halderman’s statement were focused more broadly on Dominion Voting and election device vulnerabilities:

1. Dominion has no offered spot that is shown to deal with all of the security issues in Dr. Halderman’s Security Analysis
2. The irregular gain access to that happened in Coffee County presents a risk to the whole Dominion ballot system
3. Intruders might assault and contaminate either the ICX BMD or the ICP scanner that checks out the QR codes for all in-person ballot
4. Intruders might likewise assault and contaminate the county Election Management Server not simply the BMD
5. Both the ICP in-person scanners and ICC mail-in tally scanners can not discover photocopied tallies
6. Malware might live on either the ICX Precinct scanners, the ICC main absentee tally scanner and even the Election Management Server
7. Halderman would concur with Dr. Stark that Georgia’s audit treatments are completely insufficient
8. The only method to eliminate malware-based scams is with hand counted outcomes or really thorough audits for each race on the tally
9. All Dominion system elements were established without adequate attention to security throughout style, software application engineering, and screening
10. Malware that is spread out by an Election Management Server might likewise contaminate that server
11. Malware might likewise be configured to contaminate ICP in-person ballot scanners not simply the BMDs
12. Malware might likewise be set to contaminate ICC absentee tally scanners
13. Halderman was not provided the chance to analyze the server that prepares election tasks for the existing or previous Dominion system in spite of claims by Ryan Germany’s SOS Investigative report that he would
14. He would likely have actually discovered comparable security shortages in the Dominion servers election jobs and other parts if he had actually been considered that chance to analyze them
15. He might have described why Paul Maggio had the ability to image copy every Dominion Voting System element other than the BMD

The post The Culling vs. Raffensperger Lawsuit: Evidence of Voting Machine Vulnerabilities and Fulton County 2020 Election Issues Entered into the Federal Record appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit

This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.