The corrupt court in New York accepted a movement today from Sam Bankman-Fried’s sureties to keep their identities redacted in the event and the district attorney supported the movement!
We reported on January 3 that the Clinton judge supervising the SBF case enabled the identities of 2 of the sureties backing SBF to stay confidential. These people or entities were backing the release of SBF and putting down numerous countless dollars to set SBF complimentary.
Corrupt Clinton Judge in the SDNY Rules that Two Entities Backing SBF’s Bail Can Remain Anonymous
Today it was reported that the SDNY District court led by Clinton Judge Lewis Kaplan has actually permitted the 2 sureties that are confidential to stay confidential and yet these sureties signed $500 k and $200 k different surety bonds. The kicker is the district attorney supported the movement.
SDNY District Court movement to continue to edit Sam Bankman-Fried’s 2 non-parent sureties however revealed they signed $500 K and $200 K different look bonds. The district attorney supports the movement. What a farce! @gatewaypundit #FTX #FTXbankruptcy #FTXScam pic.twitter.com/NGKBwa42 XE
— Bob Bishop– Forensic Investigator (@BobBish40288847) January 20, 2023
There is a possibility that the sureties who stay confidential are entities associated to Stanford University that might have some ownership in SBF’s moms and dad’s house. We can not validate this today.
The post The Corrupt New York Court Agrees to Keep the Identities of SBF Sureties Redacted and the Prosecutor Supported the Motion appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
