The Attack Was In Jordan, But Jordan Plays Dumb

0
33
the-attack-was-in-jordan,-but-jordan-plays-dumb

Wow! Discuss a Charley Foxtrot (aka Cluster F ck). CENTCOM (i.e., U.S. Central Command put out a news release about the Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) attack on its base situated on the northern border of Jordan referred to as Tower22 Why is it a Charley Foxtrot? Due to the fact that it is now clear that Jordan did not desire this base determined and is loathe to confess that it has U.S. soldiers in its area.

The Kingdom of Jordan lost no time at all in rejecting that this took location inside Jordan:

Jordanian Minister of Government Communications Muhannad Mubaidin stated Sunday that the attack targeting U.S. forces near the Syrian border did not take place inside Jordan.

Mubaidin informed the state-run Al Mamlaka television that the attack targeted the al-Tanf base in southeastern Syria.

I do not understand what the nature of the basing contract in between Jordan and the United States. Usually, a host nation would state that the U.S. might (or might not) acknowledge military operations or activities. In this case it appears like CENTCOM provided the declaration about the attack without speaking with the Government of Jordan. This might imply that moving forward, the Jordanians might ask the United States to close down its operations and move whatever throughout the border into Syria. I envision my previous associates at the State Department are rushing to attempt to un-ruffle Jordan’s plumes. At a time when the U.S. is desperate to keep its allies in the area on board with U.S. policy, this is a significant shiner for U.S./ Jordanian relations.

The Pentagon is being extremely stingy with information surrounding the attack. This was not a little drone. This is the type of damage and casualty count you would receive from something like a Hellfire rocket. I’m not stating that was what was utilized. The UAS was big and brought an effective warhead of some kind.

The other curiosity is that U.S. military sources are declaring that the U.S. forces that it was a “friendly” airplane, which is expected to discuss why no air defense was triggered. Here is the current reason:

American air defenses stopped working to obstruct an attack drone that eliminated 3 U.S. soldiers and injured lots in Jordan due to the fact that the inbound airplane was misinterpreted for a friendly drone going back to the base, authorities stated Monday …

The weaponized drone struck the soldiers’ living quarters, referred to as containerized real estate, at a center referred to as Tower 22 in northeastern Jordan, where its border assembles with Syria and Iraq. Sabrina Singh, a Pentagon spokesperson, stated the attack took place early Sunday as workers at the base were still in bed asleep.

The Pentagon has actually modified the variety of workers hurt in the attack, from 34 to more than 40, Singh stated. Another authorities, who like some others spoke on the condition of privacy to explain the armed force’s continuous evaluation of the event, stated 47 soldiers were injured as an outcome of the occurrence.

Fifty overall casualties? Holy smoke. I believe the only drone in the U.S. toolbox packaging that type of punch is the MQ Predator B:

The MQ-9 brings a range of weapons consisting of the GBU-12 Paveway II laser-guided bomb, the AGM-114 Hellfire II air-to-ground rockets, the AIM-9 Sidewinder, [13] and the GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM).

So what was it? Has Iran or some other nation or group got its hands on a system equivalent to the MQ 9 drone? Or was this a ballistic rocket that the air defense stopped working to engage? The existing story about the tyrpe of weapon utilized is not the fact. What is particular is that whatever air defense system in location on that base stopped working.

I talked about a few of the current advancements in Ukraine and the attack on Tower 22 with the Judge today:

The post The Attack Was In Jordan, But Jordan Plays Dumb appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit


image
image

This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.