On Monday, June 12, the Williamson County Commission in Tennessee will satisfy at 7 p.m. in the Williamson County Administrative Complex. On their program is a resolution from the Williamson County Election Commission (WCEC) worrying financing for the ES&S device ballot system (plus extra devices call the ExpressLink system) for Williamson County elections.
You’ll remember that on Monday, May 8th, a previous WCEC resolution stopped working for absence of a bulk, which sent out the WCEC back to a drawing board.
Citizens continue to have severe issues about the county’s ongoing dependence on susceptible ballot makers and have actually been emailing and calling commissioners about this.(I can put you in touch with numerous of these individuals.) A number of residents have actually gone to Commissioners individually to much better comprehend any issues and address any concerns they might have. Below are the primary issues they have actually informed us … and our responses as residents to those concerns.
This scenario continues to pit resident “Davids” versus an established WCEC/establishment “Goliath” who is declining to think about the recorded and accurate issues of a great deal of people. The WCEC’s “intent” to pursue a research study of hand-marked paper tallies( in their brand-new resolution) is thought about by a lot of to be a weak deal indicated to siphon off votes in assistance of the devices and never ever finish the research study. Or do so with preconceived lead to mind. People have actually had previous experience with the WCEC worrying “research studies” which they have actually flatly declined to do.
From our discussions with Commissioners, we’ve discovered half are reluctant about stating “no” to buying more ES&S ballot devices. Numerous have actually provided us 3 factors that, our company believe, have actually originated from discussions with the Williamson County Election Commission (WCEC). Here are responses to these issues that in fact inform a fuller story that all Commissioners and people ought to know.
1. Commissioners state they do not wish to breach state law.
A. State law does not prevent using hand-marked paper tallies (HMPBs).
– Evidenced by the reality that Shelby County, Hamilton County, Maury County and Knox County are all performing elections with hand-marked paper tallies.
– All absentee tallies are on hand-marked paper and now consist of a watermark for security. These very same tallies might be utilized for early and election day ballot.
– While describing using precinct-based optical scanners/tabulators, Tennessee Code Annotated 2-20-101 mentions worrying tallies: “… into which optical scan voter-verified paper tallies, significant either by hand by the citizen or with the help of a gadget, are placed …”
– Tennessee Secretary of State Tre Hargett supports hand-marked paper tallies (2nd quote): https://rumble.com/v2dx3fi-hargett-and-goins-voice-support-for-hand-marked-paper-ballots-and-precinct-.html
B. In precincts where the vote count surpasses 300, state law TCA 2-9-109 needs that counties “… will be geared up … with ballot makers for usage in all elections …” This language is planned to use to the ways of counting tallies instead of how tallies are significant. Optical scanning tabulators are needed to count the tallies. Tally marking gadgets are not.
2. Commissioners state they do not wish to require the WCEC to take legal action against the County.
A. The WCEC can select this strategy, however it is not needed.
B. An alternate strategy would be for the WCEC (an unelected body) to deal with the County Commission (a chosen body, acting to represent the ‘will of individuals’) to establish a ballot system that reacts to the legitimate and thoroughly investigated issues of the people of Williamson County. We have actually used to the WCEC a basic procedure to instantly evaluate HMPBs.
3. There is a financial obligation here.
A. In regards to this concern, it makes good sense for the County Commission to ask for the WCEC to license an extensive examination of all expenses related to the ES&S system. The preliminary expense is mostly paid by the state and HAVA (Help America Vote Act [ 2002] funds (still tax payer dollars!), future expenses consist of software application and hardware upgrades, brand-new licenses, expenses for ES&S to establish each election and, in most cases, be on-site prior to, throughout and after an election to make sure the makers carry out effectively, perhaps brand name brand-new devices in 2-3 years, the possibility of WCEC including another brand-new piece of equipment/system like the WCEC prepares to include this year with the ExpressLink software application and 145 ExpressVote printers for $121 K, among others.
B. In personal organization, hardly ever (if ever) is devices that is utilized on an extremely erratic basis gotten as a capital investment. This is especially real in an environment where the quality of the item remains in concern and updating of future designs of that devices is most likely.
C. Always, constantly, constantly an option to purchase includes a total cost-benefit research study of not simply makers, however all that they impact. In this case, the best advantage to be thought about is making the most of election security. Provided the cloud of unpredictability surrounding the adjustment of votes cast on electronic ballot makers and the necessary function of election stability in the ongoing success of our constitutional republic, a five-to-ten-year cost/lifecycle/benefit analysis cost-benefit research study comparing hand significant paper tallies and the ES&S system need to be carried out prior to picking which system to acquire. To be significant, this research study needs to be carried out by an independent body and needs to consist of cyber security knowledge and educated resident participation.
4. Still like makers? Examine this link for a cyber professional’s three-minute Congressional testament concerning makers: https://rumble.com/vtacuu-halderman-tells-congress-voting-machines-can-be-hacked-anywhere-anytime-by-.html
Still not pleased? Inspect this accessory: https://tennesseeelectionintegrity.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ Why-citizens-against-machines-FINAL-052023 pdf
Citizens’ significant issues are on page one and counterclaims to a minimum of 10 things the Williamson County Election Commission informed Commissioners in their 13- page May 4, 2023 letter are on page 2.
The post Tennessee Election Integrity Group Hopes to Block Funding for ES&S Voting Machines appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
