Kari Lake submitted a brand-new reply quick in the Arizona Supreme Court on Monday, calling Maricopa County out on their lies and asking the court to sanction County lawyers.
The Gateway Pundit has actually reported thoroughly on the proof of illegalities provided in Lake’s suit. Freshly found proof reveals that device failures impacting 10s, if not hundreds, of countless citizens on election day were most likely brought on by deliberate misbehavior Untested and misconfigured device settings, printer settings, and tally paper sizes used by Maricopa County triggered devices at 60% of voting areas to stop working on the day that Republicans ended up 3:1 to choose Kari Lake and Republican prospects.
This triggered huge lines and wait times for mostly Republican citizens. 10s of countless citizens, a few of whom waited in line for hours, positioned their tallies in the strange “door # 3” to be presumably counted off-site later on. It is uncertain the number of Kari Lake citizens chose simply not to vote.
Kari Lake just recently submitted a Motion for Transfer in the Arizona Supreme Court, prompting the court as soon as again to think about “remarkable brand-new proof provided in Lake’s movement for remedy for judgment,” which was submitted in May2023 The brand-new Motion for Transfer is based upon “ Maricopa’s admissions in its Answering Brief submitted on October 25, 2023,” state Lake’s lawyers.
Still, Maricopa County incorrectly argues, ” [a] bsolutely absolutely nothing has actually occurred because the previous rejection which would alter the outcome of this Petition.”
In the October 25 filing, “ Maricopa implicitly or agreeably confessed did not perform its county L&A screening on its 446 vote-center tabulators on October 11, 2022 (the just declared day for statutory L&A screening) or after it changed the sd card,” argue Lake’s lawyers.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Maricopa County sent a reaction to Lake’s Motion on Friday, declaring that tabulators were working precisely as desired and misrepresented the law to validate their sham Logic and Accuracy screening, which is indicated to guarantee that votes are arranged properly.
Lake’s lawyers compete that “ Maricopa misleadingly mentions Arizona law mandating the Secretary of State (” SoS”) to carry out L&A screening and overlooks Arizona law mandating the county to perform its own L&A screening. There are certificates for each.”
This remains in action to Maricopa County’s current admission that they did not test all tabulators with the reprogrammed software application set up and utilized after reasoning and precision screening. Rather, Maricopa declares that the “last Election Program” passed the Secretary of State’s reasoning and precision screening, which sufficed to set up the program on tabulators without public notification or screening to license that makers precisely checked out and counted votes!
In doing this, they point out the law and requirements for the Secretary of State’s part of reasoning and precision screening, which does not use to Maricopa County. The Elections Procedures Manual plainly specifies that reasoning and precision screening need to be performed by counties on “ all voting devices prior to each election.”
Maricopa County even more declares it “evaluated all of its tabulators on October 4 through 10, 2022,” then reprogrammed the makers with reformatted sd card that “passed the Secretary’s reasoning and precision screening, on October 14 through 18” These dates do not correspond with Maricopa County’s public notification of Logic and Accuracy screening on October 11 or the Arizona Secretary of State’s October 11 certificate of Logic and Accuracy screening. Even if Maricopa County’s claims hold true, they did not offer the needed public notification for political celebrations and observers for their secret screening.
Lake’s lawyers argue that Maricopa ” misleadingly conflates” the law relating to Logic and Accuracy screening with the objective of “ misinforming the Court.”
” Maricopa’s failure to carry out L&A screening in accordance with A.R.S. § 16-449 and the EPM is likewise a criminal infraction,” The filing states.
Read the County’s public notification dated October 7 and the Secretary of State’s “Logic and Accuracy Equipment Certificate outdated October 11:
The appropriate court filings can be discovered in sequential order in our report here
Lake’s group does not presently have a right to submit a reply to Maricopa County’s reaction short in this matter. It is connected to a movement asking for the Arizona Supreme Court grant leave to submit it.
The filing concludes with an ask for sanctions versus the County, mentioning their “ duplicated and purposeful mischaracterizations of the record and Arizona law.”
Lake’s lawyers have actually been approved many times for challenging the election and now deal with disbarment.
“ This Court must move and expeditiously hear this case. In addition, provided Maricopa’s duplicated and intentional mischaracterizations of the record and Arizona law, Lake respectfully moves that the Court sanction Maricopa and award Lake her expenses related to this quick.”
Read the complete short listed below:
Kari Lake’s Reply in Support of Petition to Transfer– November 20, 2023 by Jordan Conradson on Scribd
The post JUST IN: Kari Lake Files Bombshell Reply Brief in Election Fraud Lawsuit Exposing Maricopa County’s Lies– Moves That The Court Sanction Maricopa County appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
