Sen. Hawley Considers Criminal Referral for Zuckerberg — Demands Testimony Under Oath After Whistleblower Exposes Meta’s Dangerous Collusion with Communist China

The globalist empire of Big Tech is being dragged into the light, and U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) is leading the charge.

In a scathing letter sent Thursday, Hawley invited Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to testify before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, following explosive testimony from a former Meta executive turned whistleblower.

Sarah Wynn-Williams, who served as Facebook’s Director of Global Public Policy from 2011 to 2017, delivered a bombshell under oath: Meta didn’t just sell out American users — it surrendered to the Chinese Communist Party.

In her riveting testimony, Wynn-Williams exposed Meta’s secret project—code-named “Project Aldrin”—an initiative that allegedly handed China’s Communist regime access to sensitive U.S. artificial intelligence technologies.

Her most alarming claim? That Meta executives deliberately briefed Chinese officials on cutting-edge AI to give Beijing the upper hand over American companies.

“These briefings focused on critical emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence – explicit goal being to help China outcompete American companies,” said Wynn-Williams.

She warned that Meta’s LLaMA AI model is already being used by China in military applications and stated that the only reason the CCP doesn’t currently have unrestricted access to U.S. user data is because Congress intervened.

This is no longer just about privacy—it’s about national survival in the face of an aggressive foreign adversary, aided and abetted by America’s own Big Tech titans.

Wynn-Williams testified that Meta developed censorship software for the CCP in 2015 and, under Beijing’s orders, removed the account of Chinese dissident Guo Wengui—a man living on U.S. soil—just to placate the communists. Worse yet, Meta then lied to Congress about why they did it.

“Mark Zuckerberg pledged himself a free speech champion,” Wynn-Williams said. “Yet I witnessed Meta work hand in glove with the Chinese Communist Party to construct and test custom-built censorship tools.”

She also confirmed that Meta pursued a sweetheart deal with the CCP to hand over user data from Hong Kong and China—and possibly even Americans—via Chinese-located servers.

Following Wynn-Williams’ bombshell testimony, Hawley told NOTUS, “They’re flying CCP officials to the United States and doing meetings, I mean, that is something. So I think it’s just the tip of the iceberg.”

“We may need to refer him to the Department of Justice. We’ll look and see if there are other instances that we need to be pursuing in that regard,” he added.

In his formal letter to Zuckerberg, Hawley cited the damning list of allegations—ranging from aiding China’s military AI ambitions to actively suppressing whistleblowers with gag orders and legal intimidation.

“The American people deserve to know the truth,” Hawley wrote. “Her testimony was filled with explosive allegations about your company’s willingness to jeopardize American national interests, betray American users and Chinese dissidents alike, and lie about it to Congress.”

“The public deserves to hear your response to these serious allegations, particularly since they pertain to American national security,” he added.

After yesterday’s shocking revelations, it’s time for Mark Zuckerberg to come to Capitol Hill, take an oath, and answer to America for how he has sold out our country’s security for China profits pic.twitter.com/AWUib4bI9s

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) April 10, 2025

The upcoming hearing, aptly titled “A Time for Truth, Part II”, promises to be a political reckoning for Zuckerberg, Meta, and Big Tech’s cozy relationship with Communist China. If Hawley gets his way, this won’t be just another hearing—it’ll be a political earthquake.

The post Sen. Hawley Considers Criminal Referral for Zuckerberg — Demands Testimony Under Oath After Whistleblower Exposes Meta’s Dangerous Collusion with Communist China appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.