The Gateway Pundit reported the United States Supreme Court on Wednesday accepted hear Trump’s governmental resistance claim in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s January 6 case in Washington, DC. This particularly addresses whether he can avert charges lodged versus him connected to the supposed insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.
The high court will hear oral arguments on an accelerated schedule the week of April 22 and choose by the end of the term in June or earlier.
As Jim Hoft formerly kept in mind, the liberal media had a series of dumb hot takes following the choice, particularly on CNN and MSNBC They can not bear the reality Trump will dominate possibly.
But the most significant disaster comes from MSNBC’s the majority of notorious host: Rachel Maddow. She was a visitor on fellow leftist MSNBC anchor Chris Haye’s program All In With Chris Hayes to offer her “analysis” of the sensible judgment.
She started her tirade by declaring that the judgment showed the Court was not a reasonable star which Trump will never ever deal with trial. Maddow then remarkably declared that if Trump wins re-election, he will NEVER leave workplace and remain in power for life to prevent going to prison.
WATCH:
NEW: Far-left MSNBC host Rachel Maddow works herself into a panic and declares Donald Trump will stay in workplace for life if chosen in 2024.
I’m persuaded MSNBC is in fact simply a crazy asylum.
” When [Supreme Court] undoubtedly guideline that presidents aren’t immune from … pic.twitter.com/HTvuWSVYUV
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) February 29, 2024
If you consider the court as a reasonable star and a good one, it ends up that was an unreasonable supposition, and it ends up they’re not that.
The conclusion we can reach now, based upon what they have actually done without awaiting the judgment, is guaranteeing Trump will not deal with trial. And when they undoubtedly rule that presidents aren’t immune from prosecution after they leave workplace, what that will inform Donald Trump, if already he is president, is that he can never ever leave the workplace of the presidency.”
If he is voted out in 2028, he can not leave workplace, and he is welcome to dedicate any criminal offenses he wishes to, as long as he is still president, in order to overlook the outcome of that election and remain in power for life, since otherwise he’s gon na go to jail when he goes out.
But she was refrained from doing! She kept opting for her tantrum and implicated the court of interfering in the election and attempting to serve as Trump’s “political pal.”
VIDEO:
” This is B.S.– you were doing this as a dilatory technique to assist your political buddy,” states @Maddow on SCOTUS. “And for you to state that this is something that the Court requires to choose due to the fact that it’s something that’s uncertain in the law is simply ostentatious, ostentatious bullpucky.” pic.twitter.com/v1NKDorzb0
— All In with Chris Hayes (@allinwithchris) February 29, 2024
It’s obvious what they’re finishing with the pacing here … undoubtedly pressing all of the cases they can press where Trump will be representing election before we’ve heard the decision in any of these cases. Got it.
But it’s likewise the concept that the resistance thing is an open concern. Is it actually an open concern? What is the most well-known pardon in American history? Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon as soon as he had actually resigned and was a previous president.
Why? Quote: “As an outcome of specific acts or admissions happening before his resignation as president … Richard Nixon has actually ended up being responsible to possible indictment. Whether he will be prosecuted depends upon findings by the proper grand jury and the discretion of the licensed district attorney. “
The concept this is an open concern, the concept that a president can never ever be attempted … is disproven by a plain reading of American history. The concept this needs to be used up is them stating the sky is green.
This is B.S.– you were doing this as a dilatory method to assist your political pal. And for you to state that this is something that the Court requires to choose since it’s something that’s uncertain in the law is simply ostentatious, ostentatious bullpucky.
The post WATCH: Loony Rachel Maddow Flips Out After Supreme Court Agrees to Hear President Trump’s Immunity Claim appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
