President Trump’s lawyer Christina Bobb signed up with Bannon’s War Room previously today to go over Kari Lake’s historical suit versus the taken Midterm Election in Arizona.
This interview was one day after Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County submitted their ‘ Answering Briefs‘ in the Arizona Court of appeals.
The Gateway Pundit just recently reported that the Arizona Appeals Court purchased a conference to be arranged for February 1 in Lake’s claim versus the taken election. Lake just recently informed Steve Bannon, ” We understand they took the election, and we have more proof appearing.”
Katie Hobbs and Maricopa County were provided up until January 17 to react and try to get the case declined. Both submitted ‘Answering Briefs’ in an effort to have the case dismissed prior to the hearing date.
Read Maricopa County’s Brief here:
Read Katie Hobbs’ Brief here:
Christina Bobb discussed this upgrade with Bannon on Wednesday, informing the audience that “Kari Lake’s legal group submitted a really engaging appeal,” and she is “Extremely not impressed” with the defense’s action.
Read Kari Lake’s complete appeal HERE!
Christina Bobb informed Bannon, “Kari Lake’s group now gets a possibility to submit a reply to the action … and they’ll submit that in the next couple of days.”
Bobb likewise discussed her brand-new approaching book, “Stealing Your Vote: The Inside Story of the 2020 Election and What It Means for 2024,” which is set to expose the corruption in the Democratic Party and the weak RINO facility with an intro from Steve Bannon. Preorder it today!
“
” If the Court of Appeals wishes to verify the high court’s viewpoint and simply rubber stamp this and progress, they essentially need to develop brand-new law in Arizona,” Bobb mentioned. “I believe this boils down to the stability of our judicial system. Do the Judges have the stability to make the legal, right, accurate judgment?”
The Gateway Pundit reported that Arizona currently had one gubernatorial election reversed by the courts almost one year after the election due to a miscount of votes. These Judges need to choose the right, accurate judgment and follow the recognized precedent!
Watch listed below:
Bannon: Walk me through. How engaging is her defense? Ma’am, you’ve gone through the documents.
Bobb: Not extremely. I was really happy to see the documents. Kari Lake’s legal group submitted a really engaging appeal. The law in Arizona is really clear; it’s been developed for 100 years. I f the election doubts, implying you can’t inform who in fact won, you can’t inform whether citizens were disenfranchised, and there’s unpredictability surrounding the election, then that county requires to be tossed out. It’s really, extremely clear, and it has actually taken place prior to in Arizona’s History. Kari’s case is clear. When you have almost two-thirds of the makers breakdown on Election Day and issues with the tally on-demand printers, they can’t check out the tally, and then you’ve got whistleblowers, you’ve got issues with signature confirmation. There’s no doubt that this election doubted. If this election was not unsure, I do not understand what an unsure election appears like. So, her case is extremely strong. And the defense’s reply essentially states, “nuh uh.” It argues that what she’s stating is not real. I suggest, all of us saw the makers breakdown. All of us saw the enormous lines. And they’re generally stating that she’s making her claims based upon fallacies and things that are not provable and not real. I believe she has actually more than shown her case. I believe the high court judge, Judge Thompson stopped working to follow Arizona law, stopped working to follow the recognized precedent. And if the Court of Appeals wishes to verify the high court’s viewpoint and simply rubber stamp this and progress, they generally need to produce brand-new law in Arizona. They need to state that the requirement is something besides doubting due to the fact that she’s more than shown that point.
Bannon: So, in a nutshell, you’re not impressed with the defense that Hobbs has installed is that how we’re to take it?
Bobb: Extremely not impressed. I believe this boils down to the stability of our judicial system. Do the Judges have the stability to make the legal, appropriate, accurate judgment? Kari Lake has actually more than shown her case, and the general public has actually seen this play out and seen precisely what took place in the Arizona election. I do not believe it’s deceiving anyone. Therefore there’s sufficient there to make the appropriate legal accurate judgment. And it’s up to the Judges whether they in fact have the stability to do that.
Bannon: When will we have a hearing?
Bobb: The hearing is February 1. Kari Lake’s group now gets a possibility to submit a reply to the reaction that the offenders simply submitted last night. And they’ll submit that in the next couple of days. And then, the oral arguments will be on February 1, and we’ll see what the court guidelines.
Bobb: Please have a look at taking your votes You can get it on Amazon. I offer all the information about what occurred and, more notably, what average people, daily individuals, can do to get included to make certain it does not take place in ’24
Via Bannon’s War Room:
Preorder “Stealing Your Vote: The Inside Story of the 2020 Election and What It Means for 2024” by Christina Bobb today!
The post WATCH: “Do The Judges Have The Integrity To Make The Lawful, Correct, Factual Ruling?”– Christina Bobb Tells Bannon She Is “Extremely Unimpressed” With Katie Hobbs’ Weak Response To Kari Lake’s Lawsuit appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
