Roger Stone Exclusive: Adam Schiff Is at It Again

0
44
roger-stone-exclusive:-adam-schiff-is-at-it-again

By Roger Stone
August 1st, 2022

Pencil-neck is at it once again.

The Washington Post released a page-one above the fold story reporting that an unlawfully gotten audio reporting of a discussion in between Congressman Matt Gaetz and me at a conservative conference in Florida in 2019 revealed me requesting Gaetz’s assistance of a governmental pardon and showing exactly what Gaetz had actually stated public ally on various events; not just did he support such a pardon however he was positive that President Trump would see the oppression and corruption of my indictment and would eventually release governmental clemency in my case.

The Post’s page-one “nothingburger,” in fact damage a regular lie informed by Hillary Clinton, Congressman Jerry Nadler, Congressman Hakeem Jeffries and Congressman Adam Schiff– that I had actually in some way traded my silence concerning undefined misbehavior by the President in return for clemency– an oft duplicated lie for which there is no proof nor reality.

Within hours, the unpleasant Adam Schiff published a recycle of this claim on Twitter. The concept of Adam Schiff implicating anybody of lying, provided his performance history, is relatively amusing in itself.

The previous weekend, Congressman Adam Schiff– who lied for over 2 years about having actually seen more than circumstantial proof of collusion in between Russian intelligence and the Trump project– was on CBS‘s Face The Nation and declared that the January 6 th Committee had actually “developed links in between Trump consultants Roger Stone and General Michael Flynn and the extremist groups who assaulted the Capitol on January 6 th

Schiff is, obviously, attempting to suggest that General Flynn and I had advance understanding or were associated with some method the unlawful actions at the Capitol on January 6th, which is not just unconditionally incorrect however likewise for which there is no proof whatsoever. It is a traditional usage of the “regret by association” method that Schiff and his understudy Rep. Jamie Raskin, are so proficient at.

January 6th Unselect Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson informed The Hill that extra proof concerning this declared “link” was not consisted of in the telecasted committee hearings for absence of time, declaring that since testament by White House Counsel Pat Cipollone needed to be consisted of in the very same televised hearing, that the “script” needed to be altered. To put it simply, they have no proof of misdeed by either me or Flynn. This is the very same specific line of disinformation that Schiff and his partner Congressman Eric Swalwell utilized in the whole “Russian collusion” scam.

When President Donald Trump acknowledged the political nature of my indictment for “lying to Congress” about “Russian collusion” which we now understand never ever even took place, in addition to the impressive rigging and corruption of my DC trial; he initially travelled my jail sentence and eventually provided me a complete and genuine governmental pardon. A fast scan of traditional media short articles will expose that while the commutation of my jail sentence was extensively reported, today, many “wire service” leave out any reference of the pardon.

When the news of my commutation was launched, Schiff practically instantly recycled the exact same discredited BS that he had actually promoted 3 years; “Roger Stone was the link in between the Trump project and Russian Intelligence officer( s).” Schiff is aware of the reality that my entirely benign exchange through Twitter direct message with the personality of Guccifer 2.0 occurred after WikiLeaks had actually currently released all of their files concerning Hillary and the DNC which the material of this exchange revealed no proof whatsoever of collusion, partnership or cooperation. He likewise understands I launched the whole exchange in 2017 so none of this was a discovery.

In truth, Schiff understands that the assertion that Guccifer 2.0 is a “Russian intelligence officer” is a spurious claim by John Brennan’s CIA however is a concern much in disagreement. Previous NSA counter-intelligence officer Bill Binney and previous CIA counter-terrorism officer Ray McGovern have actually composed countless words and produced frustrating forensic proof that suggests that Guccifer 2.0 is most likely a CIA produced cutout along with developing that the proof that the Russians carried out an online hack of the DNC is nonexistent.

Mueller’s district attorneys argued that my case needed to be heard by Judge Amy Berman Jackson due to the fact that they declared my indictment was a “associated case” to the case of seventeen supposed Russian secret agent who Mueller declared had actually hacked the Democratic National Committee. Mueller’s district attorneys even guaranteed the Judge that they would produce proof versus me obtained from search warrants in stated Russian hackers case at my trial. They, obviously, offered no such thing. The Russian hackers case has actually never ever even gone to the discovery stage (naturally), and therefore neither Mueller nor the “intelligence companies” he mentions because case have actually ever been needed to produce real show that the DNC was the target of an online hack by Russian properties.

Judge Jackson forbade my defense lawyer from producing specialist witnesses or any forensic proof which would have shown that the underlying property of my criminal indictment– that the Russians hacked the DNC– never ever really occurred, which the forensic proof shows that information taken from the DNC had, in truth, been downloaded to some type of portable drive and physically gotten rid of from the DNC head office.

Schiff, challenged previous Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the weasel most accountable for the invalid Mueller examination, previous acting Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, still believe that if they duplicate these lies over and over once again adequate times, they can recreate the magic of the early days of the Mueller examination prior to declassified files were lastly launched showing that the whole “Russian collusion” claim was a scam. Schiff and his cronies are now recycling the very same methods in their January 6th witch-hunt.

In retrospection, I now acknowledge that every concern that I was charged with depending on my response to was presented by Adam Schiff. It is now perfectly clear that Robert Mueller’s dirtiest police officer Aaron Zelinsky, a previous Hillary Clinton State Department attorney, bully and corrupt district attorney shared the fruits of the search warrants in my case which he defrauded several federal judges and magistrates to get with Schiff, sorting through my e-mails in order to structure “gotcha” concerns for my voluntary look prior to your house intelligence committee.

Then, in direct infraction of House guidelines, Schiff shared my categorized testament with Zelinsky. Zelinsky wasn’t brilliant sufficient to prepare an indictment from such thin gruel, so he went to among the most corrupt and vicious district attorneys in United States history, Andrew Weissman. Because Mueller remains in the early phases of Alzheimer’s and was reputably described as “mumbles” around the Special Counsel’s workplace, Weissman was actually running the entire corrupt program. This shifty maneuver by Adam Schiff discusses why, once again in infraction of House Rules, Schiff and his partners Rep. Eric Swalwell and Rep. Joaquin Castro all forecasted right away after my testament that I would be prosecuted for perjury. What did they I understand that I didn’t?

The shenanigans of Adam Schiff are standard procedure for this charlatan, who often makes explosive public charges easily lapped up by the lap-dog media in order to create headings. Schiff and his enablers in the media essentially never ever create evidence to back his allegations.

In truth, it’s carny barker Schiff’s path of fabrications that are constantly moving. Let’s evaluate his sordid record;-LRB-

In a March 22, 2017 exchange with Chuck Todd on Meet journalism Daily, Todd recommended that the proof of collusion was at finest circumstantial. “Actually, no, Chuck,” Schiff stated. “I can inform you that the case is more than that. And I can’t enter into the details, however there is more than inconclusive evidence now. … I will state that there is proof that is not circumstantial and is quite worthwhile of examination.”

On Nov. 1, throughout a House Intelligence Committee hearing, Schiff set out the proof for Trump-Russia collusion. “What is clear is this: the Kremlin consistently informed the project it had dirt on Clinton and used to assist it, and a minimum of one leading Trump authorities, the president’s own kid, accepted.” Schiff, naturally overlooked that truth that Donald Trump, Jr. got absolutely nothing whatsoever from the Russian legal representative he consulted with, which the Russian female in concern satisfied both prior to and after the Trump Tower conference with Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS, who produced the phony file about Trump with support from Russian intelligence properties. Schiff likewise disregarded concerns about who provided her visa to go into the nation– after the U.S. lawyer for the Southern District of New York rejected it. Naturally, Schiff never ever lets the realities obstruct of an excellent political smear.

On Dec. 10, 2017 Schiff when again specified, “We have all of these realities in chronology, you ‘d need to think that these were all separated events, not linked to each other– simply does not make logical sense … We do understand this: the Russians used aid, the project accepted aid, the Russians offered assistance and the president made complete usage of that aid. That is quite damning, whether it is evidence beyond an affordable doubt of conspiracy or not.”
Again, the Trump project accepted and used absolutely nothing. Do not disrupt little Adam Schiff when he’s on a rhetorical roll.

Schiff specified on Feb. 7, 2018 that there was “definitely a great deal of proof” of collusion in between the Trump project and Russia.” He included, “In regards to ethical infractions and acting versus the interest of the United States, that proof is currently adequate and in the general public view.”

Again, the congressman from West Hollywood has actually produced proof of no such thing.

In what seemed a direct turnaround, Schiff appeared on ABC’s “The View” on March 3,2018 He lastly needed to yield that the panel he co-chaired had actually seen no proof at all that the Trump project “conspired” with the Russian federal government throughout the 2016 election.
Yet on April 15, appearing on ABC’s “This Week,” Schiff made a point to state that it was “merely not real” that there had actually been no proof the 2016 governmental project for Donald Trump conspired with Russia.”

Schiff, the ever-hopeful wannabe star, continued making headings such as this one on April 27, 2018: “ADAM SCHIFF ANNOUNCES DEMOCRATS HAVE EVIDENCE OF TRUMP/RUSSIA COLLUSION.” The story priced estimate Schiff: “In truth, we discovered proof of collusion in the plentiful secret conferences and interactions in between Trump project authorities and partners.”

Finally, Schiff altered his assertions of collusion yet once again on NBC’s “Meet journalism.” As if attempting to clarify his lots of inconsistent declarations, he safeguarded his committee’s examination, stating: “At the start of the examination, there was inconclusive evidence of collusion.” You will remember back in 2017 he informed Chuck Todd, who ought to be working behind the counter at Macy’s, “I will state that there is proof that is not circumstantial …” Little Adam Schiff can’t keep his lies directly.

None of this obviously even discuss his absurd shenanigans throughout the Ukrainian impeachment scam where Schiff as soon as again got captured lying about conference with the so-called “whistleblower.” It’s a winner to state that the whole Ukrainian fraud was formulated in Adam Schiff’s workplace after their whole Russian collusion farce crashed and burned. Now extremely Schiff is attempting to fan the coal of the Russian collusion misconception one more time.

One thing is perfectly clear. If Robert Mueller and his filthy police minions had any evidence whatsoever that I dealt with Russian intelligence to take and distribute information from the democrats, they most definitely would have charged me with it. If Mueller and his henchmen had any proof that I had actually gotten files from WikiLeaks (who they still wrongly claim got the files from the Russians) and passed them on to the Trump project, they would have charged me with that. If Mueller and his 12 mad democrats had any evidence beyond the plea haggled caused uncorroborated claims of founded guilty phonies Michael Cohen and Rick Gates that I ever even spoke to Donald Trump about WikiLeaks, they undoubtedly would have prosecuted me on that charge and would have utilized it to impeach the President.

Then, obviously, Schiff developed a “whistleblower” for the functions of a 2nd stopped working impeachment versus President Donald Trump in the Ukranian scam. The “whistleblower” ended up being a member of his own personnel.

Schiff likewise notoriously modified text in between White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and Congressman Jim Jordan relating to January 6th prior to dripping them to the media.

This is, obviously, the exact same Adam Schiff who firmly insisted that the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop computer was “disinformation direct from the Kremlin,” a claim that now even The New York Times acknowledges is completely incorrect.

If CBS was a genuine wire service, they may hesitate about even talking to Congressman Adam Schiff, provided his long record of lying to the general public, however then we understand CBS is not an impartial wire service however simply a co-conspirator in the crazy effort to damage President Donald Trump and anybody who is faithful to him.

The post Roger Stone Exclusive: Adam Schiff Is at It Again appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit

This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.