REVEALED: “Unusually Aggressive” Arizona Grand Jury That Indicted Trump 2020 ‘Alternate Electors’ Stacked with “Indict Them All” Leftists

0
27
revealed:-“unusually-aggressive”-arizona-grand-jury-that-indicted-trump-2020-‘alternate-electors’-stacked-with-“indict-them-all”-leftists
Arizona AG Kris Mayes

According to Politico, the grand jury that prosecuted Trump 2020 alternate electors, Trump lawyers and GOP activists were “abnormally aggressive” and stacked with Trump-hating leftists.

Politico talked with a witness who got a resistance arrangement. The witness informed Politico that not just did grand jurors strongly barbecue them for hours, they prosecuted 2 of Trump’s attorneys who weren’t even a target of the examination!

One grand juror was referred to as the leader of the “prosecute them all crowd”– a wild leftist who desired all of Trump’s allies charged with criminal offenses even if.

Two of Trump’s attorneys, Jenna Ellis and Christina Bobb were witnesses and particularly informed they were not being examined. Ellis and Bobb both got letters from district attorneys mentioning they were not under examination and 2 months later on they were arraigned by the “prosecute them all” grand jury.

” In my over 20 years practicing criminal law, I’ve never ever experienced somebody who was a witness being prosecuted less than 2 months later on, who was informed in composing that they’re a witness and not under examination,” previous federal district attorney Renato Mariotti informed Politico.

Politico reported:

One of the witnesses who talked to POLITICO highlighted the divergence in between the grand jurors and district attorneys. The witness, who got a resistance arrangement over the winter season, was informed to anticipate approximately an hour of questioning on some boilerplate information of the probe.

Instead, grand jurors grilled the witness for 3 hours, in some cases in pointed and accusatory methods– “a level of aggressiveness that captured me off guard.” The witness remembered a juror who “appeared to be the leader of the ‘arraign them all crowd’ and asked ‘pointed however particular concerns.'” Another grand juror asked “more top-level concerns” like, “How could you even speak to these individuals? What were you believing?” with long “preambles” that made his views of the case understood, the witness stated.

Another smaller sized faction of grand jurors regularly reframed the concerns of the more aggressive jurors and appeared to be more doubtful of the angle they were taking, the witness remembered, keeping in mind that this group was noticeably “rolling their eyes, heavy sighing, moving annoyingly.”

Last month Trump 2020 alternate electors, GOP state lawmakers, previous Arizona GOP chairwoman Kelli Ward and others were arraigned by a state grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday.

An overall of 18 individuals associated with the Arizona alternate electors prepare were prosecuted by the Arizona grand jury last month.

Arizona’s Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes revealed last month. She protected her witch hunt and the curious timing of the indictment– simply months before the 2024 basic election. Make no error, the charges are an alerting shot to anybody who might wish to challenge the 2024 election.

” We performed a comprehensive and expert examination over the past 13 months into the phony electors plan in our state,” Arizona’s Democrat Attorney General Kris Mayes stated in a video revealing the charges. “I comprehend for a few of you today didn’t come quickly enough. And I understand I’ll be slammed by others for performing this examination at all. As I’ve specified in the past, and we’ll state here once again, today, I will not permit American democracy to be weakened.”

Kris Mayes confessed in 2015 she was examining Trump’s 2020 alternate electors from Arizona.

In an unclean relocation, Mayes’ workplace understood the alternate electors were going to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights however she made them appear before a grand jury anyhow This is an extremely uncommon and dangerous relocation.

The Fifth Amendment enables an individual to exercise their right to stay quiet to secure versus self-incrimination.

Democrat district attorneys needing the Pro-Trump alternate electors to plead the Fifth before a grand jury might needlessly bias the grand jurors.

Although the Fifth Amendment is not an admission of regret, grand jurors might presume the pro-Trump alternate electors are guilty.

The state grand jury prosecuted 11 Trump alternate electors, state lawmakers, GOP activists and others.

President Trump was called “Unindicted Coconspirator-1” in the indictment since he made a telephone call about the tally counting to previous guv Doug Ducey.

The post REVEALED: “Unusually Aggressive” Arizona Grand Jury That Indicted Trump 2020 ‘Alternate Electors’ Stacked with “Indict Them All” Leftists appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit

This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.