There’s an unique location in hell for this one.
Earlier today Kristinn Taylor reported on Nancy Pelosi’s repellent attacks versus Trump and Trump fans.
Pelosi implicated the 75 million strong Trump advocates of not appreciating the “self-respect and worth of everyone.”
Pelosi Trashes Trump: “Cancerous … Malignancy”, and His Supporters: “They do not share our worths in regards to regard for the self-respect and worth of everyone”
Here is what Nancy Pelosi states about conservatives.
Of course, Pelosi was out gaslighting the masses when again.
Nancy Pelosi has NO RESPECT for the self-respect of life.
Nancy Pelosi has a 100% pro-abortion ballot record. She is has the leading score from NARAL.
No infant is safe in America while Nancy Pelosi remains in workplace.
Here is Pelosi’s record on the self-respect of life.
Via OnTheIssues
Voted YES on broadening research study to more embryonic stem cell lines. Allows federal financing for research study that uses human embryonic stem cells, no matter the date on which the stem cells were originated from a human embryo, offered such embryos:
- have actually been contributed from in vitro fertilization centers;-LRB-
- were developed for the functions of fertility treatment;-LRB-
- remained in excess of the requirements of the people looking for such treatment and would otherwise be disposed of; and
- were contributed by such people with composed educated permission and with no monetary or other temptations.
Proponents support voting YES since:
Since 2 years earlier, the last Stem Cell costs, public assistance has actually risen for stem cells. Research study is continuing unconfined and, sometimes, without ethical requirements in other nations. And even when these nations have ethical requirements, our failures are enabling them to acquire the clinical edge over the United States. Some recommend that it is Congress’ function to inform scientists what sort of cells to utilize. I recommend we are not the arbiters of research study. Rather, we must cultivate all of these techniques, and we must sufficiently money and have ethical oversight over all ethical stem cell research study.
Opponents support voting NO since:
A bargain has actually altered worldwide of science. Amniotic fluid stem cells are now readily available to open a broad brand-new location of research study. I believe the American individuals would invite us having a hearing to comprehend more about this appealing brand-new location of science. As it stands today, we will merely need to discuss the costs on the benefits of info that is well over 2 years of ages, and I believe that is regrettable.
The current findings of the pluripotent epithelial cells shows how rapidly the world has actually altered. Would not it be great to have the scientist prior to our committee and have the ability to ask those concerns so we may make the very best possible judgment for the American individuals?
Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill HR 3 (” First 100 hours”); vote number 2007-020 on Jan 11, 2007
Voted YES on enabling human embryonic stem cell research study. To offer human embryonic stem cell research study. A YES vote would:
- Call for stem cells to be drawn from human embryos that were contributed from in vitro fertilization centers
- Require that prior to the embryos are contributed, that it be developed that they were developed for fertility treatment and in excess of scientific requirement and otherwise would be disposed of
- Stipulate that those contributing the embryos offer composed authorization and do not get any payment for the contribution.
Reference: Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act; Bill HR 810; vote number 2005-204 on May 24, 2005
Voted NO on limiting interstate transportation of minors to get abortions. To avoid the transport of minors in circumvention of specific laws associating with abortion, and for other functions, consisting of:
- Allowing for exemptions to the law if the life of the small remains in risk or if a court in the small’s house state waive the adult alert needed by that state
- Allocating fines and/or as much as one year jail time of those founded guilty of carrying a small over state lines to have an abortion
- Penalizing physicians who intentionally carry out an abortion treatment without acquiring sensible evidence that the alert arrangements of the small’s house state have actually been pleased
- Requiring abortion service providers in states that do not have adult authorization laws and who would be carrying out the treatment on a small that lives in another state, to offer a minimum of a 24 hour notification to the moms and dad or legal guardian
- Specifying that neither the small nor her guardians might be prosecuted or demanded an infraction of this act
Reference: Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act; Bill HR 748; vote number 2005-144 on Apr 27, 2005
Voted NO on making it a criminal offense to damage a fetus throughout another criminal activity. Vote to pass a costs that would make it a crime to damage or eliminate a fetus throughout the commission of a violent criminal activity. The step would set criminal charges, the like those that would use if damage or death occurred to the pregnant female, for those who hurt a fetus. It is not needed that the person have anticipation of the pregnancy or intent to damage the fetus. This costs restricts the death sentence from being enforced for such an offense. The costs specifies that its arrangements ought to not be analyzed to use a female’s actions with regard to her pregnancy.
Reference: Unborn Victims of Violence Act; Bill HR 1997; vote number 2004-31 on Feb 26, 2004
Voted NO on prohibiting partial-birth abortion other than to conserve mom’s life. Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: Vote to pass an expense prohibiting a medical treatment, which is frequently referred to as “partial-birth” abortion. The treatment would be permitted just in cases in which a ladies’s life remains in risk, not for cases where a females’s health remains in risk. Those who performed this treatment, would deal with fines and approximately 2 years in jail, the ladies to whom this treatment is carried out on are not held criminally responsible.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Santorum, R-PA; Bill S. 3; vote number 2003-530 on Oct 2, 2003
Voted NO on prohibiting human cloning for recreation & & medical research study. Vote to pass a costs that would prohibit human cloning and penalize lawbreakers with as much as 10 years in jail and fines of a minimum of $1 million. The expense would prohibit human cloning, and any efforts at human cloning, for both reproductive functions and medical research study. Prohibited is the importing of cloned embryos or items made from them.
Reference: Human Cloning Prohibition Act; Bill HR 534; vote number 2003-39 on Feb 27, 2003
Voted NO on financing for health companies who do not offer abortion details. Abortion Non-Discrimination Act of 2002: Vote to pass a costs that would forbid the federal, state and city governments that get federal financing from victimizing healthcare service providers, health insurance companies, health care companies, and any other type of healthcare center, company or strategy, that decrease to refer clients for, spend for or supply abortion services. In addition the expense would broaden an existing law “conscience provision” that safeguards doctor training programs that decline to offer training for abortion treatments.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Bilirakis, R-FL; Bill HR 4691; vote number 2002-412 on Sep 25, 2002
Voted NO on prohibiting Family Planning financing in United States help abroad. Vote to embrace a modification that would get rid of language reversing President Bush’s limitations on moneying to household preparation groups that offer abortion services, therapy or advocacy.
Reference: Amendment sponsored by Hyde, R-IL; Bill HR 1646; vote number 2001-115 on May 16, 2001
Voted NO on prohibiting partial-birth abortions. HR 3660 would prohibit physicians from carrying out the abortion treatment called “dilation and extraction” [Understood as “partial-birth” abortion] The procedure would enable the treatment just if the life of the female is at threat.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Canady, R-FL; Bill HR 3660; vote number 2000-104 on Apr 5, 2000
Voted NO on disallowing transferring minors to get an abortion. The Child Custody Protection Act makes it a federal criminal offense to carry a small throughout state lines for the function of acquiring an abortion.
Reference: Bill sponsored by Ros-Lehtinen, R-FL; Bill HR 1218; vote number 1999-261 on Jun 30, 1999
Rated 100% by NARAL, showing a pro-choice ballot record.
The post PURE EVIL: Pelosi Who Supports Abortion Up to Birth– Smears Trump Supporters for Not Respecting “Dignity and Worth of Every Person” appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
