Back in September of 2022, forensics skilled Erich Speckin found over 10,000 tallies in Pennsylvania’s Allegheny County that had considerably inferior image quality compared to other tallies supplied:
” Many of these images have comparable flaws in the printing/copying procedure which would show typical source of production, however various than the staying analyzed tallies. Plainly in the mail in counting location, a random printing flaw that might have existed in sending by mail out of tallies might not regularly return and be relied on the very same scanner. A printing flaw on the printing side of the tally production is not the most likely cause of this abnormality.”
The Gateway Pundit reported on these findings and kept in mind that the 10,000 tallies was practically the margin of success for Marine Corps veteran Conor Lamb in his race versus Army veteran Sean Parnell.
Parnell declared that, on election night in 2020, his personnel identified it was mathematically difficult for Lamb to win and Lamb had actually presumably called Parnell on election night to praise him on his success. As the numbers started to drip in for the days and weeks after the election, that altered.
Forensics Expert from AZ Audit: Allegheny Co, Pennsylvania Had at Least 10,000 Anomalous Ballots
Speckin is a forensics professional in file assessment with 29 years experience. Back in 2016, “517 Business and Life” composed a short article about Speckin’s history in forensic file evaluation, consisting of deal with cops departments, lawyers, and assessment with the television Show “CSI”.
He has actually evaluated election cases, consisting of tallies, “in numerous circumstances in [his] profession …” Yesterday, Speckin launched another report after more examination into the information discovered on the tabulator’s CVR types gotten through Right To Know demands from Allegheny County.
From the report:
In this case, I had access to PDF scans of the front and back of each tally in addition to the matching
PDF of the information for the counting and inventory of each tally Every tally has a distinct private
recognizing number connected with the counting and becomes part of the PDF file name.…
As an outcome of just having images, the forensic assessment that can be carried out is restricted. It is constantly
better to have the initial proof when possible.
Finding 1:
In his examination, Speckin discovered that there were over 170 circumstances where a tally seemed a replicate scan. This conclusion was stemmed from comparing all of the marks on tally images offered by the county and comparing them with tally images that have the “exact same markings.” The evaluation of replicate scanned tallies is continuous and might possibly increase. AuditTheVotePA is reporting their analysis so far is at 252 examples.
Finding 2:
The Cast Vote Record (CVR) was the next focus in his evaluation. In this part of the examination, Speckin discovered that “in this county, over 50,000 circumstances of non-unique tabulator CVR numbers were discovered on 8 of the tabulators utilized to scan and count votes.” Speckin continues that a few of the CVR numbers were discovered two times and some were discovered 3 times. Below is notated the replicate counts with their collaborating CVR number along with the triple counted examples: 
Attorney Stefanie Lambert signed up with the Conservative Daily podcast to speak about the findings in Speckin’s report. Below is a clip of that podcast. You can discover the complete length variation here
Speckin made suggestions to additional take a look at the tallies based upon his findings:
Based on the forensic findings, it is my viewpoint that more work and evaluation of the initial tallies
must be carried out to identify what significance these findings have on the entire of the
roughly 700,000 tallies cast.1. Evaluation the initial tallies that were scanned and produced the sent images to
figure out the scope and connection of these printing abnormalities or if an alternative theory
might exist that can not be identified at this time.2. Identify the information of the scanner with the abnormalities kept in mind in the user, timespan
scanned, and reason for the bad image.
a. To identify the origin of the initial tallies if the problem is with a printing
problem.
b. Conduct a research study of the ballot pattern (if any) in these locations compared to other
properly printed tallies.3. If the initial tallies are offered:
a. To search for impressions of tallies into each other. In the regular course of ballot
these would not be submitted one on top of each other.
b. Using infrared light to identify if more than one ink formula was utilized to
finish a tally and which races included various inks to see if there is any
pattern of additions or not.
c. In tallies that are color printed to evaluate the CPS code and yellow printed dots to
identify resemblances in the makers and the timing for the printing procedure.
Erich Speckin likewise had a function in the evaluation of tallies in Maricopa County from the 2020 audit. In 2015, he signed up with resident reporter Nick Moseder to discuss his findings of 36,000 tallies in Maricopa in this podcast
The Gateway Pundit has actually connected to Allegheny County Elections for talk about the report. We will upgrade the post if any action is offered.
The post New Forensic Expert’s Report Out of Allegheny County, PA Shows Duplicate Ballot Scans and over 50,000 “Non-Unique Tabulator CVR Numbers” appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
