How the CIA Engineered the “Russian Collusion” Coup d’État to Remove Donald Trump from the Presidency
Guest post by Jerome R. Corsi
As the FBI is required to divulge extra files on their “Crossfire Hurricane” counterintelligence examination, the Hillary Clinton “Russian Collusion” disinformation project is collapsing, making it clear the CIA was at the center of an intelligence company coup d’état operation focused on eliminating Donald Trump from the presidency.
Newly launched FBI files explain that the FBI had belongings of, however never ever taken a look at, 2 of Seth Rich’s laptop computers. Rather of analyzing the laptop computers in an FBI laboratory, the FBI turned the laptop computers over to CrowdStrike. The Mueller district attorneys relied upon a three-page “forensic report” that CrowdStrike got ready for the FBI, arguing Seth Rich was not the source who dripped the DNC e-mails to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks throughout the 2016 governmental election.
The Mueller Report blamed Guccifer 2.0 for taking the DNC e-mails based once again on a report initially divulged by the Washington Post on June 14,2016 That story asserted that Russian federal government hackers had actually permeated the DNC computer system network, getting to the entire database of opposition research study on GOP prospects. In my 2022 book, Coup d’État: Exposing Deep State Treason, I record that Guccifer 2.0 hacked just the NGP VAN produced by 2 Democratic computer system specialists, Nathaniel G. Pearlman and Mark Sullivan. All Democratic Party prospects in 2016 utilized the exact same NGP VAN system to construct their own citizen and donor databases. That year, the NGP system ran out of Washington, D.C., and was utilized specifically to handle donor contributions. The VAN system ran out of Somerville, Massachusetts, and was utilized mainly to handle citizen information. The source for the Washington Post story on June 14, 2016, was Shawn Henry, president of CrowdStrike, a previous head of the FBI’s cyber department. CrowdStrike was the cybersecurity company the DNC employed to take a look at the hack of the DNC computer systems. In 2016, Google Capital, then referred to as “CapitalG,” the financial investment arm of Alphabet Inc, invested $100 million in the then-startup business CrowdStrike. Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Alphabet Inc., is widely known to be a strong advocate of Hillary Clinton and an active donor to the Democratic Party. In 2016, while chairman of Alphabet, Schmidt was likewise working within Clinton’s governmental project to arrange its computer-driven get-out-the-vote effort.
The DNC e-mails were continued a different server at the DNC head office in Washington. There is no proof Guccifer 2.0 had any access to the e-mails worrying DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz that WikiLeaks started releasing on Friday, July 22, 2016, or to the John Podesta e-mails that WikiLeaks started releasing on October 7,2016 Seth Rich, an I.T. expert working for the DNC at the DNC head office in Washington, had access to the DNC server from which the WikiLeaks e-mails were taken. The Mueller Report plainly specifies on page 4 that Guccifer 2.0 was a “fictitious online personality” developed by the GRU, i.e., Russian military intelligence.
Larry Johnson, a previous CIA intelligence expert, has just recently showed that an analysis of the metadata in Guccifer 2.0’s Internet posts highly recommends Guccifer 2.0 was a development of the CIA. Johnson argues that the CIA positioned the metadata in the Guccifer 2.0 posts to develop the basis for CrowdStrike’s conclusion that Guccifer 2.0 was the Russian secret agent who took the DNC e-mails. Johnson points out the analysis of an independent forensic computer system detective, who utilizes the name “The Forensicator,” who analyzed the Guccifer 2.0 metadata and discovered that Guccifer 2.0 released a file on September 13, 2016, that was copied at first on July 5, 2016, at around 6: 45 PM Eastern Time. That file was copied and looked like the “NGP VAN” zip file, verifying that Guccifer 2.0 hack was on the NGP VAN server, not the DNC e-mail server which the hack stemmed someplace on the East Coast of the United States, not Russia. As reported by Patrick Lawrence in The Nation on August 9, 2017, The Forensicator identified that 1,976 megabytes of information were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took eighty-seven seconds. Moving this amount of information at this brief transfer time yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second. “No Internet service company, such as a hacker would have needed to utilize in mid-2016, can downloading information at this speed,” Lawrence composed.
In January 2016, John Brennan arranged a secret “Donald Trump Task Force” in the CIA, with the true blessing of James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence. Brennan arranged the Donald Trump Task Force on the facility that Trump was a spy, a property of Putin running for president in the United States. The Task Force members, consisting of authorities from the FBI and NSA, were handpicked, without any publishing of tasks. As a counterintelligence operation, Brennan’s Task Force might hire foreign intelligence firms, consisting of MI-6 in the U.K., in addition to Italian and Australian intelligence companies. The Task Force invested CIA cash to money travel abroad and to pay complying possessions to establish entrapment plans of Trump project authorities, consisting of Carter Page and George Papadopoulos. Out of Brennan’s private Donald Trump Task Force, the Justice Department formally started Operation Crossfire Hurricane. On July 31, 2016, the FBI officially started Crossfire Hurricane as a counterintelligence operation. Under the DOJ’s counterintelligence authority, the DOJ might send out FBI authorities overseas on FBI main company to work together with their CIA, U.K., Italian, and Australian intelligence equivalents hired into the worldwide “Stop Trump” motion.
The Steele file was crucial to CIA director John Brennan’s choice to produce an interagency “combination cell” entrusted in mid-2016 to examine Russian disturbance in the governmental election. This extremely deceptive advertisement hoc group at first reported just to Obama. The group, understood informally as the “blend cell,” produced a series of documents for the White House on Russian disturbance in the U.S. 2016 governmental election. Programs for the secret interagency job force conferences throughout the summer season and fall of 2016 were sent out in envelopes to FBI Director James Comey, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and National Security Advisor Susan Rice. A categorized 2016 record that Brennan had actually hand-delivered to Obama in a sealed envelope consisted of details from somebody Brennan explained just as “a source near Putin.” The informant is thought to have actually been a Russian source that Brennan recycled from the Steele file. Slowly, Brennan broadened the circle within the Obama administration to consist of Vice President Joe Biden. Different cabinet members, consisting of Secretary of State John Kerry, started getting sealed envelopes divulging the “combination cell” conference program. The envelopes including the programs were thought about so secret that subordinates were not licensed to open the envelopes. Often the programs were kept till welcomed individuals had actually taken their seats in the White House Situation Room.
In December 2016, the month prior to he left workplace, President Obama bought the U.S. intelligence neighborhood to compose an evaluation assessing the existing intelligence on Russian disturbance in the U.S. 2016 election. On January 6, 2017, in reaction to Obama’s demand, the CIA (headed by John Brennan), the NSA (headed by Admiral Michael Rogers), and the FBI (directed by James Comey) produced a report in both categorized and unclassified variations released under the auspices of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (James Clapper), entitled “Background to ‘Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections’: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution.” This essential file in the Russia-collusion drama ended up being the Joint Intelligence Assessment or Joint Analysis Report [ICA]
The ICA put the blame for the breach of the DNC computer systems, consisting of the theft of Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s and John Podesta’s e-mail messages on Guccifer 2.0. The ICA consisted of 2 substantial conclusions:
- Russia’s intelligence services performed cyber operations versus targets connected with the 2016 U.S. governmental election, consisting of targets related to both significant U.S. political celebrations.
- We evaluate with high self-confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) utilized the Guccifer 2.0 personality and DCLeaks.com to launch U.S. victim information.
The ICA left no doubt that Guccifer 2.0 was the Russian intelligence company hacker that took the DNC e-mails. “We evaluate with high self-confidence that the GRU communicated product it obtained from the DNC and senior Democratic authorities to WikiLeaks,” the ICA stated.
Volume one, page forty-one of the Mueller report plainly mentions: “The GRU’s operations extended beyond taking products and consisted of launching files taken from the Clinton Campaign and its fans. The GRU performed the confidential release through 2 fictitious online personalities that it developed– DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0– and later on through the company WikiLeaks.” In both of its volumes and all 448 pages, the Mueller report offers no forensic proof to support this contention, making it clear that Mueller’s district attorneys and the FBI spat up the ICA as gospel without troubling to subject the conclusion “Russia took the DNC e-mails” to a strenuous, independent examination.
The fact is that ICA released on January 6, 2017, was a collaborated intelligence evaluation that in fact included just 3 firms– the CIA, the NSA, and the FBI– with the production of the report directed and handled by Clapper’s workplace as Director of National Intelligence (DNI). President Obama asked Clapper in early December 2016 to have actually the analysis finished and reported to him prior to he left workplace the following month. The reality that the ICA was just supported by the CIA, the NSA, and the FBI, with the assistance of the DNI, did not stop Hillary Clinton from making the claim that the conclusion Russia took the DNC e-mails was a conclusion to which all seventeen U.S. intelligence firms concurred. After the ICA appeared, this phony claim was commonly parroted by the Clinton-supporting media, consisting of CNN and MSNBC.
Yet James Clapper made in his sworn testament to the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 8,2017 Clapper acknowledged that the ICA report was the work item of no greater than 2 lots handpicked experts. The claim was lastly exposed when Clapper offered testament to Congress on July 6, 2017, lastly confessing that a New York Times report that seventeen intelligence companies had actually verified that Russia interfered in the 2016 election was incorrect. On June 29, 2017, the New York Times was required to print a correction to its reporting that while “all seventeen companies of the American intelligence neighborhood” had actually authorized the ICA conclusions. The New York Times correction lastly reported properly that just 4 companies were included– the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA, the NSA, and the FBI.
Brennan was the lead cheerleader promoting the conclusions of the ICA in the intelligence neighborhood and Congress. In a prominent post released in the Wall Street Journal on July 19, 2018, investigative press reporter Kimberley Strassel defined Brennan as a very political CIA director who acted as a project and White House consultant to Obama. Strassel kept in mind Brennan was permitted to continue his position at the CIA even after he aligned himself openly with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 governmental project.
Strassel worried that Brennan “took the lead on forming the story that Russia was interfering in the election particularly to assist Mr. Trump– which rapidly developed into the Trump-collusion story.” In July 2016, Brennan dealt with an issue persuading Clapper and other intelligence firm heads, consisting of Admiral Rogers at the NSA, that Russia was accountable for hacking the DNC computer systems which Putin was accountable for offering this order to promote Trump and beat Clinton. Strassel recorded that Brennan dealt with a problem because, as head of the CIA, “he needed to beware not to be seen interfering in U.S. politics,” nor might he examine U.S. residents.
Strassel composed that Brennan’s option was to hire the support of then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, another strong Democrat fan of Hillary Clinton. In an instruction in late August 2016, Brennan informed Reid that Russia was attempting to assist Trump win the election which Trump’s consultants may be conspiring with Russia– 2 claims that Strassel commented had yet to be shown. “But the reality was unimportant,” Strassel composed. Reid composed a letter to FBI Director James Comey on hint, asking him to start an FBI examination. “The Reid letter marked the very first authorities blast of the Brennan-Clinton collusion story into the open,” Strassel concluded.
The collecting proof recommends that the CIA produced Guccifer 2.0 to blame the theft of the DNC e-mails on Russia. Once again, there is no proof Guccifer 2.0 ever hacked the DNC e-mail server. By moving Seth Rich’s laptop computers to CrowdStrike and not launching the info openly, the FBI conspired with the CIA to develop the narrative demonizing anybody arguing Seth Rich was the offender. As head of the CIA, Brennan institutionalised the U.S. intelligence companies’ joint conclusion that Russia took the DNC e-mails. The Mueller district attorneys voluntarily accepted the ICA report as recognized unassailable, as they set out to execute the CIA’s apparent choice to eliminate Donald Trump from workplace.
In 2020, Jerome Corsi released Coup d’État: Exposing Deep State Treason, from which much of this short article was drawn. In 2019, he released Silent No More: How I Became a Political Prisoner of Mueller’s “Witch Hunt,” describing how the Mueller district attorneys challenged Dr. Corsi for over 2 months for hours at a time in a closed meeting room without any windows. Dr. Corsi successfully ended the Mueller “Russian Collusion” examination when he declined to take the Mueller district attorneys’ plea offer, declaring he had actually lied to the FBI. The FBI never ever prosecuted Dr. Corsi– additional evidence the Mueller district attorneys were the ones informing the lies.
The post JEROME CORSI: How the CIA Engineered the “Russian Collusion” Coup d’État to Remove Donald Trump from the Presidency appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
