Following the Maricopa County audit of the 2020 basic election carried out in mid-2021, then-Secretary of State Katie Hobbs prompted the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to change their Dominion tabulators with brand-new devices declaring that the devices might have been damaged throughout the audit.
Then-Senate President Karen Fann rebuttled:
The Senate has issues about the most recent allegation from the Secretary of State and Maricopa County relating to changing the makers utilized in the election, over issues that they are safe to utilize
Maricopa County worked with companies to carry out audits after the 2020 election and count on their Logic & & Accuracy tests (L & & A )to state devices safe to utilize and tamper-free. The County can now utilize those exact same L & & A tests after the Senate audit. If it can’t, their L & & A tests are void. And if their makers can’t go through a forensic audit to validate what took place, then it never ever must have authorized those makers to be utilized in an election in the very first location.
The makers were however decertified and changed to the tune of $3,000,000 of the taxpayer’s cash, regardless of the EAC offering assistance on how to re-secure ballot makers if tampering is thought. It would have been substantially more affordable than $3 million dollars. The purchase of brand-new makers, nevertheless, offered private investigators a beautiful beginning point for their examination.
Maricopa County’s 2022 Election Day was filled with issues from the minute the surveys opened. One circumstances of the prevalent issues with tabulators turning down tallies was recorded by a Maricopa citizen here Prospect for Governor Kari Lake took legal action against over the inconsistency, to name a few concerns, and was approved a trial, however eventually failed after the court seriously limited what her lawyers were allowed to argue.
One of the concerns that lots of residents asked concerning this extensive rejection was “how did this take place if the devices were properly checked ahead of time? How did they pass any type of screening?”
An easy response: they likely weren’t, in spite of testament under oath from Maricopa County Elections Director Scott Jarrett to the contrary. The following is from the Lake v. Hobbs trial throughout Jarrett’s statement under oath:
Q. And are you following the treatments stated in the 2019 Election
Procedure Manual when you’re carrying out the tests of the tabulators prior to
an election?A. That’s appropriate.
Q. And would that– would those treatments need you to carry out reasoning and
precision screening?A. That’s appropriate.
Q. And what is reasoning and precision screening?
A. A reasoning and precision test, that is a 2 various sets of tests for
a federal or a statewide election that needs that a test be carried out by
the County itself as well as a test carried out by the Secretary of State.
I do not supervise the Secretary of State’s reasoning and precision test, I have to
make the devices offered for the Secretary of State’s reasoning and precision
test. For the County’s reasoning and precision test, that is to run test tallies
through; and for the County’s tests, it’s countless test tallies through
our inventory devices, both the main count inventory devices too
as the inventory devices that would be utilized at the vote centers, to make
sure that they are properly configured to arrange those tallies.
Jarrett is proper about the procedure that is needed. A.R.S § 16-449( A) states:
The officer in charge of elections should evaluate precinct ballot devices and main count devices within
30 days of an election. When it comes to federal, statewide or legal elections, the Arizona Secretary of
State need to likewise check picked devices within 17 days prior to the election.
The Logic and Accuracy test was “carried out” on October 11 th,2022 On October 12 th, 2022, Maricopa County tweeted:
Maricopa County declared that the Logic and Accuracy screening was sufficiently finished. Keep in mind Jarrett’s testament:
” … thousands of test tallies through our inventory devices, both the main count inventory devices in addition to the inventory devices that would be utilized at the vote centers”.
A brand-new report supplied to The Gateway Pundit reveals the brand name brand-new Dominion tabulators utilized in Maricopa County were most likely not checked at all by county authorities, and if they were, they were evaluated inconceivably listed below the requirements of the Arizona Revised Statute.
Each tabulator is geared up with a Lifetime Counter. It resembles a vehicle’s odometer because it keeps a count for each and every single tally go through the tabulator for the life time of the device, for this reason the name “Lifetime Counter.” The Lifetime Counter can not be reset or altered and consists of all screening The following is straight from Dominion’s handbook:
When Maricopa County purchased brand name brand-new tabulators to change the old ones, the only tallies that need to have been depended on them are tallies that were utilized for factory screening. This supplies a fairly basic beginning point in figuring out if they carried out a Logic and Accuracy test. Maricopa County’s Voting Center design needs all tabulators be set to accept the 4500 tally designs used and each is needed to be checked for every single prospect and every contest choice for each tally design the tabulator accepts. This is to guarantee the tabulators work effectively on Election Day to prevent an accident like the 2022 election.
The report and proof listed below programs that “82 of the ImageCast Precinct tabulators utilized for Election Day for the 2022 General Election had Lifetime Counters with less than or equivalent to 65 overall tallies scanned at the time surveys opened on November 8th, 2022.”
The following image is an excerpt from the system log files (SLOG) from the tabulator utilized at Central Christian Church Mesa on Election Day2022 These were gotten straight from Maricopa County by means of a Freedom of Information demand.
The Lifetime Counter reveals simply 59 tallies formerly scanned on November 8th, 2022:
This is the SLOG declare Paradise Valley Community College revealing simply 45 tallies on the Lifetime Counter:
This is the SLOG declare Charles W Harris School revealing simply 57 tallies on the Lifetime Counter:
According to the report:
The variety of tallies cast on 82 tabulator Lifetime Counters utilized on election day are so low that it
prevents even the possibility that they were checked for Logic & & Accuracy as needed by Arizona State
Statute Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16449 and the Rules and Regulations specified in the 2019 Elections Manual as
embraced by the Secretary of State.
According to Jarrett’s testament, there ought to be “countless test tallies through our inventory devices.” Why are there brand name brand-new tabulators with just double digit tallies on the Lifetime Counter when there are over 4,500 various tally designs set on each tabulator? Had actually these devices been correctly checked, it’s most likely the 19 ″ tally disparity that triggered extremely long lines on Election Day would have been captured and corrected.
We discovered through Jarrett’s statement in Lake v. Hobbs that this disparity has actually taken place in the previous 3 elections (2022 primaries, 2020 basic, and 2020 primaries). Jarrett was still dealing with the “Root Cause Analysis” that relatively simply started as soon as this explained by Kari Lake’s skilled witness Clay Parikh throughout his evaluation of the tallies and the discovery of the 19 ″ tally rather of the appropriate 20 ″ style.
Longer variation …” Vote anywhere” … seem like each tabulator needs to have ALL meanings …
But we do not understand if that’s the choice or the capability given that Hickmann never ever ends up that idea. pic.twitter.com/lo8GgfrFFM
— CannCon (@CannConActual) January 21, 2023
View the whole report here: Maricopa L&A Test Report
The post EXCLUSIVE: FOIA ‘d Evidence Suggests Maricopa County Did Not Perform Logic and Accuracy Test on 2022 Tabulators appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
