Guest post by Erasmus
Please understand that I pen the following words in order to honor a date of utmost significance in our country’s history. It is not my intent to convince existing political leaders or activists to pursue a particular technique or platform, or to lay out any specific method forward in order to conserve this republic. I am an enthusiast of horses, and therefore it would never ever be my intent to beat a dead one. As typical knowledge teaches us, we can never ever hope to advance in the future unless we keep in mind and discover the lessons of the past.
It remains in that spirit, and in the spirit of George Washington’s goodbye address, that I share these beliefs, from one American to all of his fellow Americans, regardless of political celebration or association.
On December 11, 1688, King James II of England, as he was leaving England to get away to France, tossed the Great Seal of the Realm into the River Thames. On December 11, 1936, Edward VIII’s abdication as the King of the United Kingdom– that is, his option to turn away from his solemn obligations to serve and rule his individuals– entered into impact and ended up being last.
On December 11, 2020, the United States Supreme Court, in one dreadful act, symbolically tossed the Great Seal of the United States into the Potomac River and abandoned its solemn obligations to evaluate whether our nation was following its own laws as plainly revealed in the United States Constitution. December 11, 2020, followed the 79 th anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor by simply 4 days. And like President Roosevelt’s statement concerning December 7, 1941, the date of December 11, 2020, will decrease in American history as a day of infamy. As Jewish households throughout the world were lighting their menorahs for Hanukkah and commemorating their rescue from the tyranny of lawlessness, the Supreme Court revealed that it was siding with lawlessness which it would not be hearing the case of the State of Texas versus the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Georgia, State of Michigan, and State of Wisconsin.
The situations that resulted in this case being submitted are not made complex. They might quickly be described to an average 10- to 12- year-old.
1. The U.S. Constitution is the structure of all other laws in the United States. Whatever that occurs in the U.S. is governed by the U.S. Constitution. It is the one law that rules over all other U.S. laws. The Constitution plainly specifies the rights and authority of individuals of the United States and the numerous branches of its federal government. Simply put, it informs us who has the authority and power to choose what occurs in our nation at the person (or individual), state, and nationwide levels.
2. Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution informs us who makes the guidelines relating to nationwide elections: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, will be recommended in each State by the Legislature thereof …” In other words, the Constitution provides the authority over nationwide elections to the legislatures in each of the states.
3. In the 2020 election, there were at least 4 states (Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin) in which the state executive branch (that is, the guv or other executive authorities) and/or the judicial branch (that is, the state supreme court) altered the guidelines of the election apart from the authority of the state legislature. These actions were a direct offense of the U.S. Constitution, which grants this authority just to the state legislatures.
4. The outcome of this constitutional offense was that the outcomes of the 2020 nationwide election were altered from what they would have been if U.S. constitutional law had actually been followed.
5. The State of Texas, in addition to 17 other states and 126 members of the U.S. House of Representatives, called out the 4 states that had actually broken the Constitution and challenged their election results as being illegal. They submitted their case with the U.S. Supreme Court. Simply put, about 20% of the states and about 30% of your home of Representatives collaborated with Texas and went to the Supreme Court to state that this was incorrect, which these 4 states broke federal law and altered the election.
6. The U.S. Constitution is really clear about the kinds of cases the Supreme Court need to choose. It begins by explaining the sort of cases in which the Supreme Court has “initial jurisdiction.” These hold true that can just be given the Supreme Court to choose. In Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, it states that “The Judicial Power will reach all Cases, in Law and Equity, emerging under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which will be made, under their Authority; …– to Controversies in between 2 or more States …” The sort of case that Texas was bringing, in addition to a number of other states and over a hundred congressmen, was a case in which the Supreme Court had initial jurisdiction. To put it simply, the Constitution informs us that this is the type of case that the Supreme Court was created to hear, and likewise that there is no other court in the whole world that has the authority to hear and choose this sort of case.
7. The Supreme Court declined to hear and attempt this case. The most likely factor is that the country was seriously divided and in chaos, and the Court was too shy, too hesitant to run the risk of the fallout and do its rightful responsibility. The U.S. Constitution was plainly broken– any typical middle schooler might see and comprehend that. The outcomes of the nationwide election were impacted by these offenses. The Supreme Court was produced and particularly created 234 years ago to hear these sort of cases. To put it simply, this case fell directly in the middle of the Supreme Court’s task description. It is an important part of the Supreme Court’s extremely function to hear and attempt this kind of case.
And yet it stated no. And since of that choice, nearly eighty million patriotic Americans, enthusiasts of their nation and of the Constitution that keeps her alive, were cut off from their federal government, turned down, disenfranchised, disregarded, and unheard. The truth that they continue to feel in this manner reveals no indication of slowing down, specifically after another Supreme Court choice to dismiss any more election issues, thus hammering yet another nail in the casket of election justice.
The 2020 election was really like no other. Hundreds, countless daily Americans risked their track records and even their incomes to come forward and make signed declarations, under danger of perjury, about the election scams they saw. They were widely bugged and daunted and even threatened, often by the very organizations that were expected to hear and react to their claims (like the FBI). At the exact same time, numerous information researchers and mathematicians, consisting of over 300 people who had actually previously worked for among our nationwide security companies, came out openly, in unison, and specified that the outcomes of the election were statistically and clinically difficult apart from extensive scams. Mathematics is the language of science. Where were those who are constantly stating, “follow the science”?
The 2020 election will be examined and argued and challenged and challenged for several years to come. Ultimately, somebody might even find out why there were over a hundred thousand more tallies cast in Pennsylvania than there were citizens who enacted Pennsylvania. Probably, we will never ever understand the complete degree of the corruption and scams that spoiled this historical occasion.
However, the infractions of the U.S. Constitution by the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin are unassailable. These infractions refer public record. No truth checker on the planet can alter the reality that U.S. state executive branches and state courts usurped their state legislatures in these 4 states and in doing so breached the U.S. Constitution, which consequently the outcomes of the 2020 nationwide election were unlawfully modified.
And the U.S. Supreme Court declined to do what they were expected to do– the extremely thing which the Court was created to do. It stays to be seen whether the Court will handle Moore v. Harper and lastly maintain the Constitution’s clear statement relating to the supremacy of state legislatures over elections.
Meanwhile, let us keep in mind that what took place on December 11 was the factor a million Americans, in freezing weather condition, felt obliged to go all the method to Washington, D.C., to raise their cumulative voices in serene demonstration on January 6,2021 January 6 was the outcome of December 11. Those million voices were agents of over half of the nation who still– 2 years later on– feel that this election was corrupt which existing elections can’t be relied on. We run the risk of losing among our most valuable nationwide products– hope– since we stopped working in our stewardship of individuals’s trust. It is a nationwide disgrace that the greatest court in the land declined to evaluate the law and the proof. The January 6 demonstration by a million patriots was so effective and extensive that the federal government felt obliged to perform its own intricate psyop at the Capitol and encourage a small portion of those protesters to misbehave in order to sidetrack attention from the reality. It is no coincidence that the preeminent word shepherds at Merriam-Webster just recently selected “gaslighting” as its word of the year.
And that is why December 11, 2020, will decrease in U.S. history as another day of infamy.
The post December 11, America’s Other Day of Infamy– When the United States Supreme Court Abdicated Its Responsibilities appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
