Defendant Kris Mayes (left), Plaintiff Abe Hamadeh (ideal)
Abe Hamadeh submitted a brand-new reaction to Defendants in his Motion for New Trial in the continuous suit versus the taken 2022 Midterm Election.
Hamadeh’s race was chosen by 280 votes after a “ substantial miscount” of numerous votes was found in rural Pinal County’s recount outcomes.
The Gateway Pundit reported that Abe Hamadeh submitted a ‘Motion for New Trial’ in the Mohave County Superior Court on Tuesday after the recount inconsistencies were found.
This info was dripped to the media the day prior to a state judge revealed Democrat Kris Mayes beat Republican Abe Hamadeh by 280 votes in the race for Arizona’s Attorney General.
Katie Hobbs learnt about this disparity in Pinal County however kept the info in court. The Gateway Pundit reported that Hobbs’ attorneys asked to postpone the recount arises from existing prior to the suit was dismissed. Abe stated on Tuesday, “She had all the truths, she kept this from the court, and she kept this from me. We weren’t able to provide any of this proof.”
According to Abe Hamadeh and President Trump, this disparity needs to be examined throughout the state, and all Counties need to do a complete recount. “It’s easy. If the judge enables us to check and count the tallies– we win,” stated Abe.
President Trump just recently required Republicans in Arizona to require a statewide hand recount, “and Abe will WIN,” he stated
Abe’s counterclaim to the Defendants’ actions details vital election mistakes, consisting of tally misreads, withholding of this info by Counties and the Secretary of State, and analytical improbabilities in the race called by 280 votes.
Read the complete action listed below.
Key lines from the filing:
Exactly one day after Contestee Kris Mayes was sworn in as Arizona Attorney General,1 and 2 service days after Plaintiffs initially got notification that Pinal County verified mistakes triggered legitimate votes in the attorney general of the United States race to be misread as no votes ( called undervotes), Plaintiffs submitted this Motion for a New Trial. Seriously, then-Secretary Hobbs (a Defendant in this matter) learnt about the misreads at the time of the trial, however picked not to reveal the extensive concerns till after the declaration of the recount results. Regardless of Plaintiffs severe diligence in rapidly bringing this Motion for a New Trial, Defendants basically argue “too little, too late.”
Sadly and unsurprisingly, Defendants want away the assurances of due procedure, overlook longstanding precedent, and cast aside material truths for worry of validating what the proof will unquestionably show: Abe Hamadeh, not Kris Mayes, got the most votes for attorney general of the United States when every certified vote is precisely counted.
Arizona’s constitution needs that just the “individual having the greatest variety of the votes cast for the workplace elected will be chosen” (Ariz. Const. art. V, § 1( B)) and supplies a statutory procedure to object to an election where “by factor of incorrect count of votes the individual stated chosen … did not in reality get the greatest variety of choose the workplace [] A.R.S. § 16-672( A)( 5 ). And due procedure needs that Plaintiffs be approved a brand-new trial based upon the recently found (and questionably kept) proof along with the mistake of the court of not just restricting the evaluation of tallies to a little sample (and omitting evaluation of provisionary tallies), however likewise stopping working to offer Plaintiffs time to meaningfully check the tallies in preparation for trial (not simply hours prior to the trial).
Not just did Defendant Hobbs kept Plaintiffs in the dark, Plaintiffs requested this Court speed up discovery as soon as Maricopa County stopped working to prompt react to Plaintiffs’ ask for production of records connected to provisionary tallies. Accuseds opposed the demand and this Court rejected it. See Emergency Hearing Transcript 47: 11-12(Dec. 22, 2023). Maricopa did not supply Plaintiffs with the info associated to provisionary tallies till December 31,2022 Maricopa’s hold-up in supplying crucial proof avoided Plaintiffs from prompt finding substantial, most likely result determinative, abnormalities with provisionary tallies.
Plaintiffs merely ask this court to enable the celebrations to check all tallies that stopped working to tape a vote in the chief law officer race ( referred to as an “undervote”) in all 15 counties to validate that the devices effectively and properly counted every vote in the attorney general of the United States race– and guarantee that no citizen is disenfranchised through stopped working election systems and procedures.
Additionally, Plaintiffs demand evaluation of the provisionary tallies in all 15 counties that authorities turned down on the premises that the citizen was not “signed up to vote” or “not qualified to vote” in the November General election regardless of having effectively enacted the 2018 General, 2020 General, and/or 2022 Primary.
Notwithstanding Defendants’ embellishment and incendiary language, Defendants’ reactions show something: worry. Worry that the election was not carried out effectively, fear that the reported outcomes were not precise, and, at bottom, worry of discovering the fact of the appropriate election outcome. That’s why Defendants looked for to restrict tally examination, avoided excellent faith asks asserted on unimpeachable information, and desire to silence anybody who attempt utilize a statutorily recommended procedure to check the precision of the vote count by requiring extreme sanctions and threaten bar charges. This Court ought to take this chance to completely prosecute this election contest to assist bring back openness and responsibility in Arizona elections and blaze a trail to bring back citizen self-confidence.
Questionably Withheld Evidence Will Prove That Abe Hamadeh Received The Most Votes in the Attorney General Race
The Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure Permit Motions for A New Trial in Election Contests
Plaintiffs Motion is Neither Barred by Laches Nor Moot; Plaintiffs’ Remedy is Statutorily Prescribed and Constitutionally Sound
T he whole of Arizona must not need to suffer due to the fact that of Maricopa County’s maladministration of the 2022 election or since of any organized failure that pollutes the reported outcomes of a statewide election.
Additionally, The Gateway Pundit reported on a bombshell discussion in the Arizona Senate Elections Committee, by We The People AZ Alliance, that exposed an approximated 8,327+ citizens did not cast tallies due to tabulator failures and long lines brought on by deliberate sabotage of Republican citizens in Maricopa County. It is “provable,” stated speaker Shelby Busch, that 2,572 citizens did not get to cast a tally on election day. This inconsistency is at least 9 times the margin of triumph in Abe Hamadeh’s race.
Read Abe’s action here:
Abe Hamadeh Consolidated Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a New Trial by Jordan Conradson on Scribd
The Gateway Pundit just recently reported that the Arizona Court of Appeals held a closed-door conference last Wednesday to go over Kari Lake’s claim versus the corrupt election.
We will continue to offer updates on the battle to conserve Arizona.
The post BREAKING: Abe Hamadeh Files Reply in Motion for New Trial In Arizona Attorney General Election Lawsuit– FILING INCLUDED appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
![president-trump-gives-barron-a-shout-out-at-inaugural-parade:-his-unexpected-response-is-pure-gold!-[video]](https://news.lateawakening.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/35545-president-trump-gives-barron-a-shout-out-at-inaugural-parade-his-unexpected-response-is-pure-gold-video-100x70.jpg "President Trump Gives Barron A Shout Out At Inaugural Parade: His Unexpected Response is Pure Gold! [VIDEO]")
