The Oath Keepers Trial continues today in Washington DC
Government witness Graydon Young confessed to not conspiring with people to dedicate a criminal offense on Jan. 6, following an interrogation by defense lawyer today.
Young pleaded guilty to conspiracy and blockage of Congress this June. The federal government put him on the witness stand to affirm versus Oathkeepers Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs, Kenneth Harrelson, Jessica Watkins, and Thomas Caldwell
It appeared Young was following guidelines in his plea offer to inform the federal government’s side of the story. He revealed his regret and humiliation.
However, when the defense cross-examined him, Young confessed he did not conspire with anybody verbally beyond the Capitol. He felt what he was doing was “sound judgment” provided the situations.
It appears that the prosecution stringing together a broad story that does not fit what in fact occurred?
Another federal government witness, FBI Special Agent Harris, confessed to decorating the “stack development” Oathkeepers utilized to remain together. There are no messages within any Oathkeeper talks consisting of the word ‘stack.’
” We provided the ‘stack’ name,” stated Special Agent Harris, describing the federal government.
There is absolutely nothing overtly criminal about individuals standing in a line and putting their hand on the shoulder of the individual in front of them.
Harris likewise confessed a text district attorney Jeffrey Nestler revealed the jury was utilized out of context.
Kelly Meggs mentioned “We’re refilling now” in a group chat. Defense lawyer Juli Haller got Special Agent Harris to confess he was not refilling a real weapon. In truth, he suggested the group was rearranging.
Judge Mehta appeared to blow this off as though it wasn’t crucial. He made it seem like Haller’s line of questioning was simply a “discussion” instead of a genuine line of questioning.
Is the federal government attempting to puzzle legal conduct with criminal conduct due to the fact that it is concealing something?
It definitely appears that method. And it is ending up being a growing number of apparent that Judge Mehta and his associates in the DC District are corrupt and have no organization supervising any court procedures.
This post was initially released on AmericanGulag.org
The post Government Testimony Raises More Questions Than Answers in Oathkeepers Trial appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
