A previous federal district attorney who is now representing January 6th offenders sent a Twitter thread exposing the DOJ’s treatment of one guy detained for his participation on January 6th.
According to the attorney– William Shipley– the DOJ made a mistake in the Lucas Denney case when they implicated of him of “preparation” an attack that day.
The attorney declares that the only strategy Denney had was to participate in the rally that day.
It is due to the fact that of this mistake and the truth that the DOJ is ashamed that the DOJ is rejecting Denney the exact same sentencing personality as other Jan 6th accuseds, according to the previous federal district attorney.
Filed a Notice of Appeal today for Lucas Denney. He was sentenced last month to 52 weeks in custody although he his conduct on Jan 6 did not hurt any officer, and he never ever went inside the Capitol structure.
The Gov’ t looked for and got a +2 level improvement for “preparation” an “attack” although the only “preparation” he was declared to have actually taken part in was “preparation” to participate in the rally on Jan 6. I objected at sentencing I highly think this was a legal mistake by the Court.
Luke likewise got a +4 improvement for usage of a “hazardous instrument” throughout the assualt. While a more detailed call than the “preparation”, I believe we have a strong argument that this improvement was incorrect.
Even though Luke pled guilty to the only charge versus him, other Jan 6 offenders are being provided much better personalities in plea contracts where there is no argument over the truth that Luke’s conduct was less outright.
The DOJ made a mistake with Luke, they were called out for it, they made 2nd mistake in getting an out-of-time indictment, and were humiliated a 2nd time. In retribution they are rejecting him the exact same sentencing personality they are providing to other Jan 6 offenders. I can’t enter into excessive information on this problem here, however earlier today it was interacted to me that the Gov’ t would not accept a lodging I asked for that would bring his case into line with the policy they Govt has actually embraced on other Jan 6 offenders. There is much left to do on his behalf.
Shipley goes on to explain another January 6th case he’s dealing with:
In addition, rescheduling of some matters– consisting of the upcoming Oath Keeper Trial No. 2– has me gazing at a schedule that appears like it will keep me in Wash. DC from Nov. 6 to Jan 15– with a couple weeks in there to be with household. 10 weeks of short-lived housing/hotels, and 3 sets of airplane tickets.
My customer in the 2nd Oath Keeper case is Roberto Minuta, a married dad of 2 young kids who went to DC with no weapons on Jan 6. He took some medical materials based upon some medical training he has. He belonged to what the Gov’ t calls “Stack Two”– which must be called “Crock Two”. More on that late.
The only thing he did various than other OKs who have actually not been charged with anything was to enter into the Capitol for a couple of minutes. That’s it.
There are others who did ALL THE SAME things– however didn’t stroll into the Capitol– and they are UNCHARGED.
Roberto entered into the Capitol and he’s charged as a “Seditious Conspirator” and deals with 20 years.
That is LITERALLY the only thing Roberto did various. Not embellishment. Roberto has actually offered every extra property he needed to safeguard himself, however its merely not adequate to cover the expenditure of a 5 day a week trial in Washington DC.
Why isn’t the media covering oppression?
For the remedy to media predisposition, have a look at ProTrumpNews.com …
The post Former Federal Prosecutor Now Defending J6 Defendants: DOJ Sought An Extra-Long Sentence Because They Were “Embarrassed” appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.