EXCLUSIVE– ANDREW WEISSMANN PART XIII: Weissmann and the Mueller Gang Made Up 11 More Russians in Effort to Claim Russia Hacked the DNC– It Was All a Lie

According to the WaPo(utilizing CrowdStrike, DOJ, and their other normal hush-hush federal government sources in the understand), the attack on the DNC was committed by a Russian system lead by Lieutenant Captain Nikolay Kozachek who apparently crafted a malware called X-Agent and utilized it to enter the network and set up keystroke loggers on a number of PCs. This permitted them to see what the workers were typing and take screenshots of the staff members’ computer system.

This is quite detailed details, however if this held true, then how did the DOJ find out all of these ‘information’ and utilize them in the indictments without the FBI ever forensically assessing the DNC/HRC computer systems? And because when does the DOJ, a company that just speaks the language of indictments utilize rumor and 3rd celebrations like the British nationwide Matt Tait(a previous GCHQ collector and a lover of all things associated to Russian collusion), CrowdStrike, or any other proof doing not have chain of custody accreditation as a main source for prosecution?

A 2nd point by Apelbaum was–

… that 3 of the Russian GRU officers on the DOJ desired list were supposedly working simultaneously on several non-related jobs like disrupting the 2016 United States elections(both HRC and DNC) while at the exact same time they were likewise presumably hacking anti-doping firms(Images 2-3).

Above are photos of the people the FBI states were dealing with both the DNC/HRC e-mail hacking and the Olympic doping tasks.

The very same men were dealing with both tasks which is all however difficult.

Apelbaum argues—

The truth that the 3 had numerous concurrent high effect and high exposure task tasks is odd due to the fact that this is not how normal offending cyber intelligence groups run. These systems tend to be separated, they are designated to a particular objective, and the taskforce remains together for the whole period of the task.

Next Apelbaum questioned the Mueller gang’s assertion that the ‘hacker’ called Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian–

Any proof that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian need to be assessed while keeping these points in mind:

1. He utilized a Russian VPN service to mask his IP address, however did not utilize TOR Utilizing a proxy to carry out cyber operations is a SOP [Standard Procedure] in all intelligence and LEA [Police] companies. [i.e. Russia would have masked their VPN service]

2. He utilized the AOL e-mail service that recorded and forwarded his IP address and the exact same AOL e-mail to get in touch with different media outlets on the very same day of the attack. This is so obvious and incompetent that its not likely to be an error and appears like a purposeful effort to leave traceable breadcrumbs.

3. He called his Office User account Феликс Эдмундович ( Felix Dzerzhinsky), after the creator of the Soviet Secret Police. Gadgets and accounts utilized in offending the online world operations utilize random names to avoid tractability and recognition. Why would anybody in the GRU usage this pseudonym (next to the apparent factor) is beyond understanding.

4. He copied the initial Trump opposition research study file and pasted it into a brand-new dotm design template (with a modifying time of about 2 minutes). This led to a modification of the “Last Modified by” field from “Warren Flood” to “Феликс Эдмундович” and the development of extra Russian metadata in the file. Why squander the time and effort doing this?

5. About 4 hours after developing the ‘Russian’ variation of the file, he exported it to a PDF utilizing LibreOffice 4.2(while doing so he lost/removed about 20 of the initial pages). This was probably done to reveal extra ‘Russian finger prints’ in the type of damaged link mistake messages in Russian (Images 4 and 5). Why trouble with re-formatting and transforming the source files? Why not simply get the raw information out in the initial format ASAP?

In June 21, 2016, Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai from Vice Motherboard spoke with an individual who determined himself as “Guccifer 2.0”. Throughout their online chat session, the private declared that he was Romanian (see records of the interview listed below). His bad Romanian language abilities were later on utilized to unmask his Russian recognize.

… I’m not a clinical linguist nor do I even understand where to discover one if my life depended on it, however I’m particular that you can’t dependably identify citizenship based upon somebody impersonating another language or from using phony metadata in files. This fancy theory likewise has the apparent defect of presuming that the Russian intelligence services are dumb sufficient to appear to an interview impersonating Romanians without really having the ability to check out and compose show off Romanian.

The bottom line is that if we wish to exceed the speculative trivia, the pseudo science, and the overblown unproven claims, we need to ask the genuine difficult concerns, primarily: is Guccifer 2.0 even the genuine assaulter and how did he prevent all of the logs throughout a number of weeks of duplicated gos to while downloading near to 2 GB of information?