On February 4th, 2021, at 5: 40 am, TIME Magazine released among the most considerable stories of our life time. They appeared to suffer this engrained desire to admit wrong-doing in order to amass some sort of acknowledgment, comparable to this Sam Harris admission Possibly that is what TIME Magazine and their influencers were attempting to communicate when they composed in The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election:
” That’s why the individuals desire the secret history of the 2020 election informed, although it seems like a paranoid fever dream– a well-funded cabal of effective individuals, varying throughout markets and ideologies, interacting behind the scenes to affect understandings, modification guidelines and laws, guide media protection and manage the circulation of details They were not rigging the election; they were strengthening it. And they think the general public requirements to comprehend the system’s fragility in order to make sure that democracy in America sustains.”
Up up until last night, this had actually been apparent however hard to show. Last night, Tore Maras published a file that connected it all together.
The Gateway Pundit formerly reported on the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC) along with Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai’s case in which they’re included The EI-ISAC explains their non-profit as “a relied on cybersecurity partner for election workplaces and associations, supplying EI-ISAC subscription to these companies at no charge“
TGP got a copy of a number of arrangements in between county entities that participated in an arrangement with the CIS, which is “running in its capability as the EI-ISAC”.
In this very same Memorandum of Agreement in between the CIS/EI-ISAC and Dallas County, Texas, we discover that the EI-ISAC is contracted by the Department of Homeland Security to supply “cybersecurity services … for state election entities”. This collaboration is a vibrant action towards the federalization of our elections, however it might be likewise be a definitive contract evidencing a substantial First Amendment infraction.
We likewise understand that the Department of Homeland Security is moneying the “Cybersecurity Services” and “involved security gadgets” at no charge This seems like DHS and EI-ISAC have actually participated in a contract to federalize privatize “safe” our elections at the state and county level, and incentivize states and counties to comply by using the services “complimentary”.
As long as the federal government continues to money it …
And in return for continuing to federalize privatize ” safe” our elections, the EI-ISAC/CIS gets unmatched access to the following:
As if it wasn’t bad enough that a personal 3rd party is participating in a legal arrangement with the Federal Government to do “pro bono” work for states and counties in “protecting” their election facilities, there might likewise be a significant First Amendment offense.
An unknown report from the Election Integrity Partnership entitled “ The Long Fuse” and formerly reported on by TGP sets out the participation of the EI-ISAC in functioning as a “ particular avenue for election authorities to report incorrect or deceptive details to platforms.” The EI-ISAC acted as a “ one-stop reporting user interface …” that “ enabled election authorities to concentrate on finding and countering false information while CIS and its partners reported material to the correct social networks platforms.“
The EIP “ engaged with federal government stakeholders mostly to offer analytical ability and context around election-related false information. Material reported by election authorities to the EI-ISAC was likewise routed to the EIP ticketing system. This permitted experts to discover comparable material, ascribe specific material pieces to wider stories, and identify virality and cross-platform spread …“
It looks like though the federal government has not just contracted with a personal non-profit to handle and manage, pro bono, the security of state and county elections with unidentified oversight, however the federal government likewise overturned the First Amendment by using the EI-ISAC as a “particular avenue” to report “false information” to social networks platforms in order to censor United States people.
The non-profit that is federalizing privatizing “protecting” our elections in cooperation with DHS is likewise functioning as a go-between for the federal government to censor the population for speaking up versus the work the CIS/EI-ISAC carries out.
Perhaps this holds true that Justice Clarence Thomas has actually been waiting on when he composed in Biden v. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University:
” … a ‘ personal entity is not generally constrained by the First Amendment,’ Halleck, 587 U. S., at ___, ___ (slip op., at 6, 9), it is if the federal government pushes or causes it to do something about it the federal government itself would not be allowed to do, such as censor expression of a legal perspective“
The post A Private Entity (EI-ISAC) Provides Security for Elections and after that Manages “Misinformation” for the Same Entities on Behalf of the Federal Government appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
