Another Raffensperger Special!– Emerald Robinson on Mark Zuckerberg’s Political Operative’s Unbelievable Victory in the Colorado GOP Secretary of State Primary
On Tuesday a no-name political operative who rests on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s personal election mafia the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) won the Republican main Secretary of State race in Colorado.
Popular conservative and MAGA prospect Tina Peters was leading in the surveys and had a 15 point lead on her closest rival Pam Anderson.
But Pam Anderson from Zuckerberg’s CTCL had the night of her life and beat Peters by 20 points.
Anderson returned from 15 points down to win by 20 points over Tina Peters. It was a wonder!
On Thursday investigative press reporter Emerald Robinson discussed this astounding race.
This is an exceptional report by Emerald Robinson— among the most brave and precise press reporters in America today.
The story of the GOP main race for Secretary of State in Colorado gets more intriguing the more you examine the outcomes.
As I kept in mind the other day, the huge news is that an Australian business person called Mike O’Donnell in some way got 28% of the vote (173,000 people chose him!) although ballot revealed he had no assistance, he raised $4,700 for his project, and 139 individuals were following his project on Twitter. The most interaction he got on his 1,300 project tweets was 4 “likes” on his June 27 th tweet; the majority of them had absolutely no interaction. He went from being a non-factor in a three-person race to getting more than quarter of the overall vote
Mike O’Donnell appears like an extremely good person– however can anybody describe his unexpected 28% share of the vote in the most essential election stability race in Colorado? Election authorities in Colorado had no description. The majority of the county clerks in the 17 counties that Mike O’Donnell won had actually never ever become aware of him Their responses varied from confusion to shock.
But, wait, there’s more.
The truly huge news is that Pam Anderson allegedly won the race with 43% of the vote (266,000 people elected her!) which is an astounding result — to state the really least.
It’s genuinely amazing due to the fact that 2 months prior to the main, Pam Anderson was not simply losing to Tina Peters in all the ballot and fundraising metrics, however her project was broke. She had a $5,665 balance in her project coffers. According to liberal website Colorado Pols, “this remarkably anemic fundraising is simply more proof that [Pam Anderson] is a prospect without a constituency …”
Two days after that evaluation, Colorado Pols thought about Anderson’s project dead-on-arrival and included that: “Peters’ strong efficiency even more highlights Anderson’s weak point in this race, operating on a message not simply disagreed with however thought about treasonous by a bulk of Republican citizens.”
Furthermore, Tina Peters was the apparent frontrunner in every method:
” In the Republican primary for Colorado Secretary of State, all the momentum now is with Tina Peters. By every readily available metric, Peters is the frontrunner. Peters controlled the vote at the state assembly, and now holds a commanding lead in fundraising. Peters is getting orders of magnitude more made limelights. Protection one may view as unfavorable about Peters’ criminal case, a minimum of till June 28 th, is not a significant liability with GOP main citizens. To the level they’ve become aware of Peters, a big portion will see her as a hero.”
So where were Pam Anderson’s 266,000 citizens concealing all this time prior to main day?
They were not concealing on Twitter and Facebook– that’s for sure.
The day of the main, the interest for Pam Anderson was, will we state, underwhelming on social networks.
Does these tweets appear to reveal the sort of abrupt political momentum that turns Pam Anderson from being twenty points behind Tina Peters to pounding Tina Peters by 15 points?
You need to bear in mind that Tina Peters got 61% of the delegates at Colorado’s Republican Assembly in April. What about Pam Anderson– you ask?
Pam Anderson did not even go to the Republican assembly She was so undesirable in the Colorado GOP that she was a write-in prospect who just certified in April She needed to gather 1,000 legitimate signatures from signed up Republicans in each of the state’s 8 congressional districts simply to get on the tally. In the 5th Congressional District, Anderson handled just 1,282 legitimate signatures. Obviously, more than 5,000 of the 17,904 signatures sent by Anderson were not legitimate.
In other words, Pam Anderson was not a hugely popular prospect amongst Republicans.
So how did Pam Anderson all of a sudden manage an incredible 35 point swing on Primary Day 2 months later on without any cash and no recommendations?
The only benefit that Pam Anderson had in this race: she’s on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s personal election mafia, the “Center For Tech And Civic Life.”
Isn’t it unusual that the director of Mark Zuckerberg’s personal election charity for Democrats (on short-lived leave!) simply won the most crucial election stability race in Colorado– and a GOP main no less — as a write-in prospect with a 35 point ballot swing with no cash and no noticeable assistance from Republicans?
One more thing: Colorado utilizes Dominion Voting Machines.
