This short article initially appeared on JoeHoft.com and was republished with consent and modified by The Gateway Pundit.
The case versus President Trump in New York is based upon accounting activities that are not criminal offenses. They aren’t even changing entries.
At one point in my business profession, I supervise the monetary reporting of multimillion and billion-dollar blocks of organization for a United States Fortune 500 corporation. I likewise functioned as a global business executive in Hong Kong.
In Manhattan DA Bragg’s case versus President Trump there are no criminal activities. Changing entries aren’t even needed.
The Bragg case is based upon accounting activities that the state of New York states are criminal offenses. As you will see below, these activities are not criminal offenses and they do not even make good sense.
Corrupt Soros-backed DA in Manhattan, Alvin Bragg, and the Trump-hating gang of previous Obama White House and Biden DOJ members like Mike Colangelo, dropped a BS indictment versus President Trump in April 2023.
Below is the indictment:
Here are reasons that the indictment is absolutely incorrect– no criminal offenses exist.
1. The indictment is BS for lots of factors however among the significant factors surrounds the timing of the activities declared to be criminal offenses in the indictment.
The activities for which President Trump is charged all took place after President Trump handed his multi-billion dollar company over to the control of his kids.
President Trump was not running his business at the time of these occasions. He had actually turned over control of these operations to his boys.
2. None of these activities are criminal activities in the very first location, which is why Bragg never ever notes any criminal activities.
What a crockery.
The indictment does not even state what the criminal activities are due to the fact that there are none. (Note that Twitter will not enable me to embed this tweet).
3. Even if President Trump was running his business at the time that these accounting entries were supposedly carried out, he probably had absolutely nothing to do with them in the very first location.
I base this on my own experience managing the monetary reporting for a billion-dollar block of organization. I never ever talked about any accounting entries with the business’s CEO. As a matter of truth, I never ever made entries into the journal myself. I had numerous people around the world who made entries. Making entries was their task not mine.
My bet is that President Trump never ever “made and triggered an incorrect entry” into the books of his business as is specified in the indictment due to the fact that he never ever made an entry in the books of his business. President Trump, like me and practically all executives in Fortune 500 business, never ever made accounting entries. You can wager that President Trump never ever made an accounting entry in his life.
This case is lunacy.
4. The accounting entries were made years back and the statute of constraints ended years earlier.
With Hunter Biden, the DOJ waited till the statute of restrictions passed before resolving his tax criminal activities. With President Trump, Soros-backed Bragg disregards the statute of constraints, which passed 4 years earlier, and comprises criminal offenses out of thin air.
5. Bragg declares that the 2017 activities in some way affected the 2016 election.
Seriously, how can Bragg show that future occasions affected existing occasions. This makes no sense.
6. No auditors would ever determine or make the claims made by Bragg– not in a billion-dollar service– these entries are so little they would likely never ever be discovered or resolved by an auditor.
If these were concerns, then management would make modifications, however these changes would not affect taxes or earnings because they were reported in the incorrect container and most likely didn’t affect the bottom line. Changes take place all the time. They are not criminal activities.
7. No auditor in 2022 would return to 2017 and find $100,000 in entries in a billion-dollar service.
Auditors depend on previous years’ operate in the existing year. I have actually never ever become aware of an auditor returning 5 years when carrying out an audit. Never ever. There merely is insufficient time. And once again, if they did, any concerns determined at worst would be published as changing entries. These are not criminal activities.
8. It is most likely that nobody in history has actually ever been charged with a felony for getting a billing from a supplier.
The “felonies” noted in Bragg’s case belong to 11 payments apparently made to misaligned Michael Cohen– 11 billings, 12 coupons, 11 checks or wires.
Invoices are gotten from suppliers– not made by anybody in the Trump company– Trump has no control over the invoice of billings. Charging President Trump with a felony for getting a billing resembles charging any American a felony for getting a letter in the mail.
A billing is sent out from a supplier. The supplier manages when it is sent out. President Trump did not dedicate a felony when he got these billings or any billings from any suppliers he works with. They are plainly Trumped-up charges.
9. President Trump didn’t devote a felony when among his lots of accounting professionals made an entry in his books.
Entries are made every day in the United States by accounting professionals in services of different sizes. These are not criminal activities. They can be resolved if they are made in mistake. How can Bragg show that President Trump meant to devote scams on every one of these occasions?
10 President Trump has a multibillion-dollar organization. The possibility of him understanding about these entries and preferring to dedicate scams is nil.
This whole case is BS.
The genuine lawbreakers are the numerous people operating in collusion to damage this nation and President Trump and connect him to a nasty stripper. These individuals are disgusting.
These individuals who want President Trump are associated with a conspiracy to topple our country and interfere in the last and the next election. That is where the criminal offenses are– not this.
To get brand-new posts and assistance Joe Hoft’s work, please see JoeHoft.com
The post Underlying Accounting Activities in DA Bragg Case Are Not Crimes– There Are No Crimes, Not Even Adjusting Entries! appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
