January 6th Defendant Jake Lang was detained in January 2021 and is presently being in the DC Gulag today after 3 years without trial.
In July Jake Lang alerted The Gateway Pundit that he is taking his case to the greatest court in the land.
Lang’s choice to move his arguments to the Supreme Court follows a split judgment in the DC Court of Appeals in April.
As reported by The Gateway Pundit, 2 of 3 judges on the appellate panel ruled versus U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, who dismissed the 1512 felony blockage charge in 3 different cases versus January 6th offenders.
Perhaps most noteworthy amongst the impacted was Jacob Edward Lang— extensively understood by TGP readers through several eyewitness accounts of his repetitive efforts to conserve lives throughout the attack of violence near the U.S. Capitol tunnel where Rosanne Boyland was eliminated
The split judgment renewed the felony blockage charge versus Lang and 2 others: Garret Miller, who pleaded guilty to 11 other criminal charges and was sentenced in February, and Joseph Fischer, who, like Lang, continues to wait for trial.
Lang, who is charged with several felonies, submitted his petition to the United States Supreme Court– asking that the 1512 felony blockage charge be dismissed.
The filing starts with a concern:
” Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that application of 18 U.S.C. Section 1512( c)( 2 ), a statute crafted to avoid damaging proof in “main procedures,” can be utilized to prosecute acts of violence versus law enforcement officer in the context of a public presentation that developed into a riot, leading to so “awesome” an application of the statute regarding contravene of Van Buren v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1648 (2021).”
As was thoroughly in-depth in The Gateway Pundit, the 1512 Felony Obstruction charge was repurposed particularly for January 6th accuseds.
Although Lang’s filing particularly looks for explanation in a case such as his (where violence was included), a SCOTUS judgment on the matter is most likely to have significant effect on numerous non-violent J6ers— Many of whom are presently dealing with the possibility of years in jail, in addition to the irreversible loss of their 2nd Amendment rights.
The judgment will likewise have an influence on President Trump’s case and the phony charges submitted versus the previous United States President.
The 1512 charge was a distinct charge utilized by the DOJ to particularly target Jan. 6 protesters, numerous whose only criminal activity was strolling through the open door on the United States Capitol and leaving the Capitol after a number of minutes. It is undoubtedly a political charge utilized just for Jan. 6 Trump fans.
Attorney Norm Pattis, who, together with Steven Metcalf, submitted the petition on behalf of Lang, states the present application of the 1512 statute is yet another example of federal government abuse of law as a way to “squash dissenters.”
” We are asking the court to step up and control an out-of-control Justice Department,” states Pattis.
Contribute to Jake’s Legal Fund HERE
READ the complete petition listed below:
Now it appears the United States Supreme Court will think about whether to hear the case, perhaps as quickly as Friday.
NBC News reported:
The Supreme Court will quickly think about whether to hear appeals brought by individuals charged with offenses connecting to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol in cases that might have a significant effect on the prosecution of previous President Donald Trump.
The justices are weighing 3 various appeals brought by accuseds Joseph Fischer, Edward Lang and Garret Miller.
The court was set up to talk about the cases in their routine personal conference on Friday. The conference was canceled following the death of retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.
The justices will now think about the cases at a later date, potentially as quickly as next Friday.
The 3 guys are looking for to dismiss a charge implicating them of blocking a main case, particularly the accreditation by Congress of President Joe Biden’s election success, which was interrupted by a mob of Trump advocates.
Trump has actually been charged with the exact same offense, in addition to others, in his federal election disturbance case. As an outcome, whether the court uses up the appeals or declines them might impact his case.
The post Supreme Court May Decide This Week to Hear Jan. 6 Defendants’ Case on DOJ 1512 Charges Used ONLY Against J6 Trump Supporters appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
