How is this lady enabled to supervise Trump’s January 6 trial?
Yet another prejudicial courtroom declaration made by Judge Tanya Chutkan in a January 6 case has actually been discovered as Trump requires she recuse herself from his January 6 case.
Julie Kelly acquired a records of another sentencing by Judge Chutkan for a J6er where she brazenly lied about the Capitol demonstration.
Judge Chutkan throughout her sentencing brazenly lied about the January 6 Capitol riot and called it an “armed tried topple of this federal government.”
NEW CHUTKAN FILES: I simply acquired records of another sentencing by Judge Chutkan for a J6er, founded guilty by her of 4 misdemeanors after a quick bench trial. To state her view of what occurred on January 6 is misleaded in an understatement.
It’s not embellishment, it’s a lie: pic.twitter.com/pwxEjeLgBp
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 18, 2023
Judge Chutkan stated legislators who were inside the Capitol on January 6 looked outdoors and saw “gallows being set up.”
This never ever occurred. There is no video proof to support this unreasonable claim.
After confessing she enjoyed J6 choose committee hearings– and asking an accused if he had, lol– Chutkan compares Jan 6 to Game of Thrones.
And nobody saw anybody putting up gallows. There is no video of it– and I’ve been attempting to hunt it down for 2 years without any luck. pic.twitter.com/KVQCEh4qNe
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 18, 2023
Judge Chutkan likewise stated January 6 protesters attempted to strongly topple the federal government.
She has actually currently comprised her mind on January 6 and yet she is enabled to command Trump’s January 6 trial where the previous president is dealing with 4 federal counts: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to block a main case, blockage of and effort to block a main case, and conspiracy versus rights.
President Trump’s lawyers recently submitted a movement in a DC federal court requiring Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, to recuse herself from Trump’s January 6 case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
One example of a disqualifying declaration per the movement submitted recently:
In October 2022, prior to the Special Counsel’s consultation or the filing of this case, Judge Chutkan specified:
” This was absolutely nothing less than an effort to strongly topple the federal government, the lawfully, legally, in harmony chosen federal government by people who seethed that their man lost. I see the videos. I see the video footage of the flags and the indications that individuals were bring and the hats they were using and the attire. And individuals who mobbed that Capitol existed in fealty, in commitment, to one male– not to the Constitution, of which the majority of individuals who come prior to me appear woefully oblivious; not to the suitables of this nation; and not to the concepts of democracy. It’s a blind commitment to someone who, by the method, stays complimentary to this day.” United States v. Christine Priola 1: 22- cr-242, ECF #66 at 29: 17–30:3 (sentencing records) (focus included) (pertinent parts connected as Ex. A).
Judge Tanya Chutkan is dealing with President Trump even worse than other offenders — consisting of a meth dealership.
Noted lawyer Techno Fog checked out Judge Chutkan’s current history and offered proof of predisposition after she rejected the gag order hearing dates asked for by Trump’s attorneys.
She provided the meth dealership a 1 week due date to react to a protective order.
The judge likewise set the hearing 2 weeks out after it was sent, according to Techno Fog.
In contrast, Judge Chutkan provided Trump just ONE DAY to react to an ask for a protective order.
This is clear proof of predisposition.
Mark Levin made an outstanding case in favor of Tanya Chutkan’s recusal recently and stated she is “unqualified” to command Jack Smith’s case versus Trump:
The post Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan Previously Called January 6 “An Armed Attempted Overthrow of This Government” appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
