( Note: This is a sponsored post from NewNoah. The viewpoints revealed are those of the author and not always those of Gateway Pundit)
by Kelly John Walker
A group of New Federal State of China (NFSC) dissidents reported being pestered by a ” strange drone” at a legal demonstration at the University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMBC) throughout a series of occasions last December that protesters state hindered the workout of their constitutionally safeguarded rights on public residential or commercial property, enacted by university authorities in a “cooperative relationship” with the CCP.
The protesters were likewise apparently bugged by school cops prior to being dislodged of the school by the University. A source has actually supplied that the CCP-linked billionaire Shan Weijian, whose child participates in UMBC, has actually supposedly contributed 10s of countless dollars to UMBC for the school’s effort to eliminate NFSC protesters. It will be fascinating to see if this supposed secret contribution occurred as we follow through the course of this brand-new legal action by NFSC protesters.
The group is pressing back with a Civil Complaint submitted last Friday, charging UMBC and Shan Weijian with 5 counts of prohibited conduct and requiring a minimum of $10 million in damages: “The action emerges from constraints to and disturbance with the Plaintiffs in the workout of their Constitutionally safeguarded rights on public residential or commercial property, because Defendants, separately or in show, neglected and de facto cancelled a properly released license without cause or notification, stopped the Plaintiffs from hosting indications and posters, required the Plaintiffs to consistently alter the approach of demonstration, and following the Plaintiffs without genuine factors throughout their tranquil demonstrations and picketing …”
Named accuseds consist of Darryll Pines, University President; Bruce Perry, UMBC Chief of Police, Joel Dewyer, Director of Campus Life Operations, Shan Weijian, chairman of CCP managed Pacific Alliance Group (PAG), and LeeAnn Akrou Shan, child of Shan Weijian.
The complainants declare that, at the time they requested a license, DeWyer “had a beneficial and favorable mindset” towards their intent to carry out tranquil demonstrations, and recommended they hold the demonstration in the Commons.
After using to restore the license on January 30, 2023, the group got an unanticipated reaction, starting with guidelines to stop holding indications, distributing leaflets, and running livestreams, and to relocate to a less noticeable location, on danger of forced elimination.
On February 3, 2023, without description, various police car and lots of officers forced them to stop presentations and leave the Commons.
On February 7, 2 U.S. Marshalls provided an Order dated January 13 from a personal bankruptcy court in another jurisdiction– though none of the protestors became part of the insolvency case and exempt to its arrangements. After the U.S. Marshalls left, Perry and numerous law enforcement officers purchased the protesters to stop their legally allowed tranquil demonstrations. Quickly after, the “strange drone” got here to bother the protesters.
The Plaintiffs declare they were targeted due to the fact that Weijian Shan is a CCP representative who has actually kept a close relationship with UMBC. The fit consists of examples supporting the claims that “various Chinese expats, defectors and previous CCP members have actually all described Defendant Shan as the CCP’s supreme representative in America.”
These claims highlight the CCP’s shadowy impact over U.S. organizations. “All warfare is based upon deceptiveness,” and as Brigadier General, Robert Spaulding composes in War Without Rules, the CCP’s stealth war is more concentrated on managing than killing: “Now every civilian is a possible warrior or target, every element of modern-day life is a prospective weapon, and every sphere of human activity is a possible battleground.”
Articles 7 and 14 of China’s 2017 National Intelligence Law need every Chinese nationwide and entity to spy upon need by the CCP or face serious penalty. Does it promise the CCP would neglect anti-CCP demonstrations at UMBC? Or is it most likely that the CCP would force somebody like Weijian Shan to close down their workout of totally free speech?
( It is very important to differentiate here that the evil, high-handed CCP does not represent the freedom-loving Chinese individuals, like the NFSC. Americans ought to stand with these Chinese individuals versus the CCP.)
The UMBC occurrence is a book example of the CCP’s method operandi as described in Unrestricted Warfare ( 超限戰), composed by People’s Liberation Army colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui in 1999, setting out strategies to beat the U.S. without direct conflict.
” The Era of ‘strong and brave soldiers who are historical protectors of the country’ has actually currently passed,” composed Liang and Xiangsui. “It is most likely that a pasty-faced scholar using thick spectacles is much better matched to be a contemporary soldier than is a strong young lowbrow with bulging biceps.”
Shan represents the 5 th– Generation Warfare soldier, efficient in doing more damage than a traditional soldier could. The U.S. needs to awaken and comprehend that the CCP is damaging our country from the within by means of “pasty-faced scholars,” fawning business people, and jeopardized U.S authorities.
The great news is that individuals who best comprehend unlimited warfare are the “civilian warriors” who left communist China. As victims of the world’s most significant criminal activity distribute, the Chinese individuals, as represented by the NFSC, acknowledge the CCP’s criminals. They are the civilian-soldier opposition that the CCP worries. It’s time we stand shoulder-to-shoulder with them and win this war.
About the author: Kelly John Walker is an American statesman, author, branding expert, and business owner. He is the creator of FreedomTalk, host of FreedomTalk television, and a freelance author.
The post Anti-CCP Protesters File $10 Million Lawsuit Against University of Maryland Over Drone Harassment appeared initially on The Gateway Pundit
This article may have been paraphrased or summarized for brevity. The original article may be accessed here: Read Source Article.
